Reslife4Life Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM Scoreless at half Quote
Reslife4Life Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM Is this commentator the football PA announcer? I would rather have the student from the WVU game 1 Quote
zipsrule Posted yesterday at 12:30 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:30 AM GOOOOOOAAAAAALLLLL! 1 Quote
csims0917 Posted yesterday at 12:30 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:30 AM I think it is but also GOALLLLLLL 1 Quote
zipsrule Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM Roman from Dobrijevic. 1 Quote
zipsrule Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM Zips get a 1-0 result. Quote
csims0917 Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM (edited) About as dominate as a 1-0 game can be right? Would’ve loved another goal but it wasn’t like didn’t have a bunch of chances. Onto the next one Edited yesterday at 01:19 AM by csims0917 1 Quote
NYC ZIP Posted yesterday at 01:17 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:17 AM Win is a win. Big one on the road Friday! 3 Quote
fknbuflobo Posted yesterday at 09:36 PM Report Posted yesterday at 09:36 PM Past the midway point of the first half, Zips employed a good old fashioned 4-4-2. This totally took Vikings by surprise. Remi and Farrell were the two Forwards and they immediately terrorized the CSU back line. Unfortunately, Farrell soon caught a silly yellow card, and staff removed him (and this formation). I want Zips to spring this 4-4-2 formation once again. It probably should never be our base system but it can be a real shock to the opposition. We should try it again. 3 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 21 hours ago, fknbuflobo said: Past the midway point of the first half, Zips employed a good old fashioned 4-4-2. This totally took Vikings by surprise. Remi and Farrell were the two Forwards and they immediately terrorized the CSU back line. Unfortunately, Farrell soon caught a silly yellow card, and staff removed him (and this formation). I want Zips to spring this 4-4-2 formation once again. It probably should never be our base system but it can be a real shock to the opposition. We should try it again. What is our base formation out of curiosity? Quote
fknbuflobo Posted 46 minutes ago Report Posted 46 minutes ago 4-2-3-1 is our base system, and has been so throughout Embick’s tenure. Over the years, Zips increasingly switch on the fly to a more offensive 4-3-3. The ability to switch formations while in game is the hallmark of a professional squad. Not many collegiate teams are coached to do that. Zips switch formations in more than half their matches, usually when substituting personnel, so as to not draw the opposition’s attention. Now, a 4-4-2 is a new (outdated formation) wrinkle. I would like to see us try it again, with same personnel. It’s like an NBA team running The Weave or NFL team running the Wing T. Ha! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.