Miami Spending Money

[Let'sGoZips94]

2 hours ago, GP1 said:

Where are they going to go and who is going to pay their exit fee for the ACC?

 

Let's not act like the Big Ten and SEC wouldn't be interested in the aforementioned brands. The Big 12 would also be interested in a few, including some of the others I'd imagine.

[GP1]

7 hours ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

Let's not act like the Big Ten and SEC wouldn't be interested in the aforementioned brands. The Big 12 would also be interested in a few, including some of the others I'd imagine.

Interested enough to pay the massive exit fee to the ACC for inferior products?

 

Wouldn't it make more sense, and cost nothing, to just wait out the inevitable separation of P4 schools from G5 and the NCAA? 

[Let'sGoZips94]

2 hours ago, GP1 said:

Interested enough to pay the massive exit fee to the ACC for inferior products?

 

Wouldn't it make more sense, and cost nothing, to just wait out the inevitable separation of P4 schools from G5 and the NCAA? 

 

The exit fee reduces to $75m in a few years if I'm not mistaken. That'll be picked up in a heartbeat. 

[zippy5]

So the Big 12 is currently ahead of the ACC, but the Big Ten and SEC want all the ACC brands and not Big 12 brands? Interesting

[kreed5120]

TBF Miami (FL), North Carolina, and Florida St. are all. bigger brands than anything left in the Big 12. The ACC just has a lot more dead weight. The Big 12 is more solid top to bottom. Their strength is in their depth.

 

If you're an B1G school and you want to add 2 schools it would make sense they would take 2 of the bigger brands from the ACC over any of the teams from the Big 12 IMO.

[zippy5]

Excluding ND, the ACC has seven teams with a more valuable athletic department than the Big 12's top program

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/19/cnbc-official-college-sports-valuations-2025-top-75-athletic-programs.html

Edited 2 minutes ago by zippy5