This is something I've been thinking about for a while, and because it seems to be a story right now, I thought I'd see what you all think. It's pretty clear there are different priorities in the conference. There are schools raising money and spending it, schools that would like to spend money but can't get it (EMU), schools that probably could raise money but aren't willing to increase the budget (Miami), and schools that are content with where they are- if they win, great, if not, oh well (Ball State).
There are only a handful of schools that WANT to spend more money, are willing to do what it takes, and have the ability to do so. These are the schools that, long-term, are set up best for success. And I'm talking not just one sport but at least football and basketball. I think Rob Murphy is a fine coach who will make the Eagles better, but when he leaves, they're back to square one. I think Northern is a very good football program but not as committed to basketball.
Consequently, I think it's important to identify the schools that are making the effort and backing it up. I'm not speaking directly in terms of wins and losses. It's really just about money. And I'm not talking about kicking schools out or trying to move to The Alliance or whatever. I just think it's advantageous to know who your peers are, who has conflicting interests, and act accordingly.
Right now, I think there are four schools in the MAC that are doing the right things money-wise: Akron, Buffalo, Ohio, and Toledo. What do you think?