johnnyzip84

BJ referred to the #7 raising the wheel as CJ, when it was obviously Paris McNeal. I noticed it 1st thing this morning too. I figured a number of you would catch it

Zippy is currently 140 votes up on Hokiebird and in the #1 spot overall!!!

Zips 37Can't 30

That game at Buffalo could easily be the first Bulls win over the Zips.

The line looks like it's creeping down ever so slightly. It's at 3 1/2 now. I wouldn't be surprised to see it at 1 or 2 points by the end of the week.

Link to MAC WebsiteWith Can't having some unproven players at WR, perhaps #19 will be the spy to shadow Edelman?

I suppose since I've only been on this board for almost a year, that immediately implies that I'm a neophyte to Zip football. If you bothered to read any of my posts, you'd know that I do indeed fear Edelman, as well as Jarvis and the Can't team in general. I just happen to think we'll find a way to beat them on Saturday. Only time will tell.

I am thrilled that were the underdog. This will make the win that much sweeter.

I hate is when posters say "I hate it when posters say"

....and at the end of the game, after the Zips have THUMPED the flushes, he'll follow it up with backflip with a quarter twist, but I won't care because the Zips will have the Wagon Wheel back where it belongs. I can't get too down about the way the defense played today. Yes, the Indiana QB killed them today and true, Edelman is similarly elusive, but you guys are WAY overreacting. Two questionable pass interference calls made a HUGE difference in the outcome of today's game. Our D struggled against a tremendous athlete today, but I suspect he'll make a number of defenses look bad throughout the rest of the year. I believe both sides of the ball WILL put it together next Saturday, and the team will look at this game as the springboard for the remainder of the season. I see far too much good in this defense to give up on them after a subpar outing. And it was NOT the 3-3-5 that hurt today, it was simply having difficulty staying with two very shifty runners. Yes, Can't presents a similar package, but the game is in our house and that will make a huge difference. Also, don't forget the effort the Zips expended in trying to neutralize Hardy today. Can't presents no such weapon at receiver. Go Zips!!!

Well, by whatever mechanism, Zippy has zoomed into 3rd place overall as of 5:58 psm!!

Ouch, nice Zip81! I'd hold out for a signed Jim Traficant picture!

Let's see.....Deseret News.....Salt Lake City......there's a pretty good chance!

I wouldn't mind the Zips playing YSU in 2009, but I don't want it to become a habit. I think it's easier for the FCS (formerly 1-AA) teams to get up for these kind of match-ups (upper level FCS or 1-AA vs. mid to lower FBS or 1-A). If we DO schedule them, we had BETTER win the game. I'm not sure who I hate losing to more, Can't or YSU. It's pretty close either way.

Zippy is up to 4th place overall. Am I the only one who thinks the way the voting patterns seem to shift dramatically is a little suspicious? It's almost like we're being set up for exciting matchups, with numerous lead changes throughout the week. Maybe I'm getting too cynical

This is the caption for one of ESPN's writers covering the story on their web site.

WTF?????? How is this happening? Come on Zippy!!

Yeah that Mike Holmgren......doesn't know squat about QB's

I think this is a pretty good assessment, skip-zip. I wouldn't necessarily conclude that OU has fallen just yet though. Playing those Louisiana schools down there, a northern school is not going to get very many breaks with the officiating crew. I agree about Buffalo. Our game up there scares me. Here is my order, for what it's worth.1. BGSU2. Ohio3. Miami4. Akron5. Can't6. Buffalo7. TempleBesides Temple, I don't have a whole lot of confidence in ANY of these predictions. I expect a wild race, with the typical Einsteinian tie-breakers needed to decide a winner.

I'm afraid that the obvious strength of this team (the D) could be a little fatigued for this game. I think the offense will improve, particularly the running game, but it won't be enough.Indiana 27Zips 17If for some reason the offense does not show improvement, this could get ugly (I hate to say it). When a team like Indiana (that's been down and roughed up in the Little 11 in recent years) gets an opportunity to lay a whooping on someone, they rarely pass it up.

Zippy is kicking booty!!1. 0 - 0 - 4,503 Zippy 2. 0 - 0 - 4,255 Cocky 3. 0 - 0 - 4,224 Gopher 4. 0 - 0 - 3,973 Monte 5. 0 - 0 - 3,937 Big Red 6. 0 - 0 - 3,741 Hokiebird 7. 0 - 0 - 3,702 Otto 8. 0 - 0 - 3,506 Joe Bruin 9. 0 - 0 - 3,470 Cosmo 10. 0 - 0 - 3,219 Hairy 11. 0 - 0 - 3,188 Seymour 12. 0 - 0 - 2,940 Cavman

Zippy up by 16 at 3:07 pm

The latest Harris pool indicates a serious gender advantage for Cocky, with the Carolina mascot winning 88% of the vote among eligible females.

I know we should just focus on getting Zippy to beat Cavman, but the Montana mascot (Monte) is quickly catching Zippy for #1 overall. We need to vote for the BYU mascot to help hold him off.1. 0 - 0 - 1,194 Zippy 2. 0 - 0 - 1,182 Monte 3. 0 - 0 - 1,091 Cocky 4. 0 - 0 - 1,038 Big Red 5. 0 - 0 - 1,033 Golden Gopher 6. 0 - 0 - 958 Hokeybird 7. 0 - 0 - 902 Otto 8. 0 - 0 - 827 Hairy Dawg 9. 0 - 0 - 822 Joe Bruin 10. 0 - 0 - 769 Seymour 11. 0 - 0 - 678 Cosmo the Cougar 12. 0 - 0 - 666 Cavman

It's just like Chicago politics under the Daleys......vote early and often I just noticed something pretty hilarious on the web site. Do you think they purposely pitted Southern Miss against South Carolina on this first week? After all, if you read the match-up left to right, just as it appears on the screen, it reads:SEYMOUR COCKY Is there something totally beyond subliminal going on here?