I'd be OK with Terry. After all, if you can't land a D-II finalist, might as well go for a guy who at least won a 1st round game
OK, OK, Auburn Auburn Auburn. Just messing with you.
He'll definitely take over $500K though.
He doesn't cut the most attractive profile, but he still might look good on the Akron sidelines.
We'll just have to put in a special order of some size XXXXXXXXL Shirts, Sweats and Jackets for him. No big deal.
Kangaroo: Are you sure you didn't confuse him with the old Toledo coach? It's easy to make that mistake.
Not sure I understand this question? I don't see anything that's been said that would apply to Toledo Tom.
Not much to add other than what's been already said. But I'm wondering what was up with Egner tonight. He sat on the edge of the bench the whole night (as already mentioned) and worse yet, didn't participate in any huddles during timeouts. The irony is that he was featured on the scorecard handout tonight.
Edit: Thanks Qz for the explanation!
Absolutely NOT. Anyone with the stench and taint of Ianello has to GO. And that includes Okruch and his porn 'stache. Times are not THAT desperate, my friend. And also, I do not want Mike Johnson. Just seems that he is not very personable. The community definitely would not "rally" behind that guy. He's a West Coaster. Leave him there.
1. Good luck hiring Mike Johnson or any other qualified candidate if that 2-year UA “out” clause is part of the offer.
2. Brian Wagner is one wise young man.
3. Times are desperate. Maybe LP should can TW immediately and name Vince Okruch as caretaker head coach for one year, with the understanding that Vince would be part of the next full-time coaches staff. Of course, this leaves the problem of assembling a staff for Vince. OK, never mind on this point. Points 1 and 2 still stand
You can't include such a clause in this Zips' contract. The aforementioned Jesus isn't going to be sniffing .500 at UA for at least 3 seasons.
No more banking on "mulligans," hire a good coach!!
I agree 100% that you shouldn't, in this particular case especially. But I've heard some talk that such a clause was part of the contract offered to PW. I sure hope not, or we'll never get a decent coach in here.
I have a suspicion as to why we’re having a hard time get anyone to sign on the dotted line. How many 1st time D-1 head coaches would agree to a 5-year contract that has a 2-year “out” clause? This clause, hypothetically of course, stipulates that if after 2 years the school determines the program is not going in the right direction this coach may be reassigned within the University at half of his salary.
I’m certainly no expert. I'm not even a novice. But I wonder if such a performance clause is common or not. I know we’ve had some discussion on the board about this (regarding Ianello).
OK, I need to explain. I didn't post this thinking he would actually come (because of course he already dispelled the rumors). I just found it amusing that a national writer would make the effort to dig into the UA coaching situation like he did. He even mentions the silhouette on GoZips.
Source?
Dave, Dave, Dave, afootball is the source. Has afootball ever sold us down a river before? Oh...nevah mind!
Is that "afootball" or "a football"?
If this means they're taking another look at other candidates, so be it. Although it sure does lend credence to the "Winters is Plan A with little thought for Plan B" scenario (unless Loeffler also turned them down....ugggh)