GP1

And the beat goes on... Of course, Buckeye Nation is attacking the messenger and not the message. Many claim the guy was a bad guy on the team (they cheered him after every TD though). Many say he didn't go to class (shocking). Maybe all of that is true. What does it have to do with him being right about people selling their little trinkets? "Everyone" was doing it? Probably not everyone did, but if only a few were doing it, it's further bad news. My favorite line is about the guys not even thinking about NCAA rules. Can anyone say "lack of institutional control"? How would you like to be the paper pushinig compliance officer at tOSU? Here is a guy who exists only to make sure the rules aren't being broken. He spends his entire life giving compliance presentations to players and coaches in an effort to make sure they are in compliance, and guys don't even think about him for one second after they wake up after the compliance lecture. In many ways, this compliance officer's existance at tOSU is meaningless. The stance tOSU has taken throughout this entire process has been very interesting. Basically, they are saying they understand they have been caught and they don't care. They don't care to the point they aren't even going to fire a single person over this situation...not a single change. The same people who caused the problem are going to be left in place to cause the problem again. At which point, they can take the same stance. It's brazen to the point I find it somewhat admirable. tOSU is going to lead the way to making high level college football an institutionalized professional sports league (right now, it is quasi professional, not institutional).

Can you change this from a young kid to a super model?

Why would anyone think this story is coming to an end? We are only at the beginning of the book and the best pages are ahead. The morons are only half moronic...the other half is just plain stupid. Everyone does do it, but when they get caught, they don't lie to everyone around them.

Then there is no reason to do it. A golf course has 18 holes. At most, you can get 20 foursomes off in an outing. Where I had math, 20 x 4 = 80 golfers. That's $12,000 (before expenses) @ $150 per person. I'm not impressed by the golf outing. On the other hand, 20,000 fans paying to see a Zips game at $10 per ticket is $200,000. I'm impressed by that. They need to get focused on selling tickets and not a silly golf outing. Focus, focus, focus. The termination of the football golf outing is second only the parking situation at the Rubber Bowl (it was a grass field for crying out loud) on the list of non-issues that have been made important in Zips history.

The problem the program has is they don't attract new customers because they have been so bad the past couple of years. My guess is Coach I is not a golfer and doesn't have many golfers on his staff. At the end of the day, I'm not certain a golf outing for 150 of the same people who go every year regardless of how the team performs is the answer. Those people would be happy with only a good game day experience if the team won. I've been saying this for a few years and nobody listens. They need to have people in the Athletic Department (not the football office) who schedule public speaking engagements for Coach I, KD and Coach Kest that take place throughout the summer and as many as humanly possible. Targets would be Rotary (as many as possible), Chamber of Commerce (as many as possible), Akron Womens Club, etc. Use these sessions to sell tickets. If they would just ask for freaking support instead of throwing up billboards and crossing their fingers, more people might come to the games. Put a personal touch on it. The same people who buy tickets every year are not the problem. It is a small number compared to the size of the stadium. The problem Akron has are the 20,000+ empty seats at every game...the 1,500 empty seats on average at the JAR for MBB and the 5,000+ empty seats for WBB. We are going to have a little exercise to prove my point. When I was working at GP, we made a roof coverboard used in low slop roofing. Around 30% of all low slope roofing projects at the time used a coverboard. There were lots of different types of coverboards and we had the best, but there was still some level of competition. Let's say the market share broke down as follows: Board A 15%, Board B 20%, Board C 25%, Board D 10%, Board E 30%. If you are Board E, who is the real competition?......... .......A narrow minded person might pick one of Boards A-D. This person is a fool. The real competition was the architect who did not specify a coverboard at all. If you maintain 30% market share and expand the coverboard business by working with architects from 30%-40% of all low slope roofing, don't you sell 33% more product? UofA is already getting great market share from the die-hards. They are going to get that business. What they really need to do is get the business of those not attending at all. Spending a lot of time trying to please masochists is not the way to go. I'm one of the masochists and if I still lived around, all I would want is a decent place to park within walking distance to a bar and the stadium, food at the game that wouldn't choke a goat and a seat that didn't require physical therapy after a game. I could care less about the silly game of golf or ever meeting a coach...I've met enough and they really aren't very smart guys. Everyone else wants to watch winning, or at least a team that doesn't make you want to throw up when you watch them. The hardest thing to do in sales is bring on a new customer. It is also the most expensive. It's easy to throw up billboards, buy ads in the ABJ, buy a bus ad, etc. Going out and asking people for their business is hard. It's why they don't do it. It costs NOTHING to be a speaker at a public forum. Most of the time you get a free dinner and all you have to do is get yourself there. They should put up signs around the Athletic Department saying, "Get them to the game and give them something worth watching." It's so freaking simple.

This is a really good discussion. One issue that is never brought up about the ooc schedule is, "What is the purpose of the ooc schedule?" For schools like Miami, it appears as if they use their ooc schedule to rake in cash. They were doing the same thing with their ooc football schedule for a while as well. I think we need one or two more ATM games on our schedule. Other than that, the schedule is fine. The basketball team has the highest paid coach on staff and IMNHO, doesn't contribute enough to the finances of the Athletic Department. What we really need to do is win the games we should be winning at this point and stop using the ooc schedule as a lab for what the team is going to look like come MAC time. We have a solid program with solid players. At this point, KD should know who his starters are going to be, who will be coming off the bench and when they will be coming off the bench. Let's use the ooc schedule to beat some high majors and win every ooc game against mid majors for a change. The JAR would be packed come MAC season. That is how they would better contribute to the Athletic Department. We over-intellectualize the basketball team too much.

Your sense of humor is boundless.

WE ALWAYS HEAR 'THE RULES' FROM THE FEMALE SIDE NOW HERE ARE THE RULES FROM THE MALE SIDE THESE ARE OUR RULES! PLEASE NOTE...THEY ARE ALL NUMBERED '1' ON PURPOSE! 1. MEN ARE NOT MIND READERS. 1. LEARN TO WORK THE TOILET SEAT. YOU'RE A BIG GIRL. IF IT'S UP, PUT IT DOWN. WE NEED IT UP, YOU NEED IT DOWN. YOU DON'T HEAR US COMPLAINING ABOUT YOU LEAVING IT DOWN. 1. SUNDAY SPORTS IT'S LIKE THE FULL MOON OR THE CHANGING OF THE TIDES. LET IT BE. 1. CRYING IS BLACKMAIL. 1. ASK FOR WHAT YOU WANT. LET US BE CLEAR ON THIS ONE! SUBTLE HINTS DO NOT WORK! STRONG HINTS DO NOT WORK! OBVIOUS HINTS DO NOT WORK! JUST SAY IT! 1. YES AND NO ARE PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE ANSWERS TO ALMOST EVERY QUESTION. 1. COME TO US WITH A PROBLEM ONLY IF YOU WANT HELP SOLVING IT. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. SYMPATHY IS WHAT YOUR GIRLFRIENDS ARE FOR. 1. ANYTHING WE SAID 6 MONTHS AGO IS INADMISSIBLE IN AN ARGUMENT. IN FACT, ALL COMMENTS BECOME NULL AND VOID AFTER 7 DAYS. 1. IF YOU THINK YOU'RE FAT, YOU PROBABLY ARE. DON'T ASK US. 1. IF SOMETHING WE SAID CAN BE INTERPRETED TWO WAYS AND ONE OF THE WAYS MAKES YOU SAD OR ANGRY, WE MEANT THE OTHER ONE. 1. YOU CAN EITHER ASK US TO DO SOMETHING OR TELL US HOW YOU WANT IT DONE. NOT BOTH. IF YOU ALREADY KNOW BEST HOW TO DO IT, JUST DO IT YOURSELF. 1. WHENEVER POSSIBLE, PLEASE SAY WHATEVER YOU HAVE TO SAY DURING COMMERCIALS. 1. CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS DID NOT NEED DIRECTIONS AND NEITHER DO WE. 1. ALL MEN SEE IN ONLY 16 COLORS, LIKE WINDOWS DEFAULT SETTINGS. PEACH, FOR EXAMPLE, IS A FRUIT, NOT A COLOR. PUMPKIN IS ALSO A FRUIT. WE HAVE NO idea what mauve is. 1. IF IT ITCHES, IT WILL BE SCRATCHED. WE DO THAT. 1. IF WE ASK WHAT IS WRONG AND YOU SAY 'NOTHING,' WE WILL ACT LIKE NOTHING'S WRONG. WE KNOW YOU ARE LYING, BUT IT IS JUST NOT WORTH THE HASSLE. 1. IF YOU ASK A QUESTION YOU DON'T WANT AN ANSWER TO, EXPECT AN ANSWER YOU DON'T WANT TO HEAR. 1. WHEN WE HAVE TO GO SOMEWHERE, ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING YOU WEAR IS FINE... REALLY! 1. DON'T ASK US WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT UNLESS YOU ARE PREPARED TO DISCUSS SUCH TOPICS AS BASEBALL, SEX, HOOTERS, OR GOLF. 1. YOU HAVE ENOUGH CLOTHES. 1. YOU HAVE TOO MANY SHOES. 1. I AM IN SHAPE. ROUND IS A SHAPE! STRAIGHT IS A SHAPE!FLAT IS A SHAPE! PASS THIS TO AS MANY MEN AS YOU CAN - TO GIVE THEM A LAUGH. PASS THIS TO AS MANY WOMEN AS YOU CAN - TO GIVE THEM A BIGGER LAUGH.

With the exception of only a few (the "pros/ringers" that attend these events with the expectations to shoot 18-under, and win something), everyone I know that attended the Outings was there to take a day off work, see old friends, get a little drunk, get to know the staff a bit on a personal level, and talk some Zips football in June. Golf is just something fun to do for a few hours while you're drinking and BS-ing. All the more reason to organize a group of about ten guys and invite the coaches for a golf outing. I'm sure getting some sun after spending most of their lives watching film in their offices for 22 hours a day would do them some good.

Call up some of the guys you golf with and take the coaches with you. You would probably spend less than $150. Make it about them. The difference between taking customers golfing and going on a University function is the attitude of those invited. I would hope that those invited to a University golf outing are there to support the University, not to have their asses kissed by the Athletic Department. None of us are forced to do anything for the University...not the donations, not the ticket buying, not attending games and not posting on this board. Those going to a customer golf outing are there to have their asses kissed by those inviting them and a free trip. Most people really don't like to go golfing as most aren't very good at it. My experience with golfing with customers is they look terrible after a few hours of golf. Who is stupid enough to turn down a free trip to the desert though? I'd probably suffer through a round of golf for the rest of the trip. In closing, I'm not a customer of the University when I buy something or send in a donation or buy a ticket. I'm a supporter who has never asked for anything in return and I don't expect anything in return (with the exception of my tax deduction of course). My wife and I had dinner with a real nice lady from the Development Office a couple of weeks ago in Charlotte. She offered free tickets to a football game if I come back for a game this fall. I thanked her and told her no as I would be happy to pay my own way into a game. A part of me is ashamed that she paid for dinner.

I'd ask you to be a leader in this matter and get back in the game. Round up a few of your former teammates and go to the party. Get five guys to go and then ask them to ask five others to go. Other than some of the work Gary Bogue did while working for Athletics, there hasn't been much effort to reach out to former players. This is a good effort on the part of the Athletic Department. Good effort and doing the right things should be rewarded. Something has to change and we can't sit around waiting forever for a coach or an AD or whatever that pleases 100% of the people. That's never going to happen. From what I remember through the drunken fog, the party at the Winking Lizard a few years ago was better than any golf outing they ever organized. I'd be willing to say that almost all of the guys there would agree. It was a chance for them to reconnect, with their wives/girlfriends/children if they wished, with friends. This is better than a golf outing.

I wonder as well. I have a hunch, but don't know anything for sure.

Received my invitation this week. Nice card and the printing was very good. I'd hope that regardless of the condition of the team, as many people as possible would go to this event. Not going isn't very helpful. If you live as far away as I do, you have an excuse. If you live in NE Ohio, you don't have an excuse.

VERY good idea. Customers love options and deciding which is the best value for them. This is a very inexpensive promotion for a fan, yet is doesn't involve giving away tickets. For some, the best value may be 2-3 football games and then basketball or whatever they decide is important to THEM. I guess one thing is unclear to me. Do you have to purchase season tickets before buying this or can it be purchased on its own? IDEA.... Record all tickets used (assuming they use electronic scanners at the football games). If a person uses their allotment during football season, they automatically are allowed to buy a similar package for basketball, or just another package in general. The University has to have a mechanism for rewarding going to games, not just buying tickets. If I attend every Wake Forest football game, I get a discount on my donation for season tickets the following year. Every ticket is scanned as you walk in the gate. Know not only who is buying your product, but who is actually using it. Treat those using the product better than those just buying it, but treat both well. The football team needs to be good. If it is good, then people feel good about going to other sports and the University in general. Reward fans going to games with a good team, and maybe they buy another pack for basketball and there are more than 2,000 per game for OOC basketball games.

You are a man of few words DrZ, but this is getting a little silly.

Falling in the category of things that will make you vomit is this article. Is Tressel saying the coaches at MSU and Northwestern know what it is like to be a lying, cheating scumbag? Are those same two coaches really that stupid to respond in the way they did? Tressel's senator speak is just funny at this point. Would anyone other than me want to hear Barry Alvarez answer the same question under truth serum? I'd love to know what he really thinks of Tressel and the nonsense going on at tosu.

I received the e-mails below in my personal account. This is a good example of how a university should react to a negative story. I don't know if WF athletes were involved in the story, but the Athletic Director addressing the issue in a letter to supporters sends the right message to fans, the student athletes and the general student population. A president and athletic director can't control everyone, but they can send the right message. I just thought this was unique and a good way to handle a problem. They can't control the Today Show report, but they can manage the story from their end. If you have a problem, run to the problem, not away from it. On Tuesday President Hatch sent a letter to the campus community (below) in which he said, “It is my understanding that on Thursday, NBC's Today Show plans to air a story about the problem of sexual assault on college and university campuses. We have been advised by a producer of the Today Show that the story will include an interview with a former Wake Forest student involving an incident that occurred several years ago.” News accounts of the Today Show story have been picked up broadly and report the alleged involvement of two former Wake Forest student-athletes. I assure you that Wake Forest University and the Athletics Department take very seriously our commitment to provide a positive and secure environment for our students. As the President stressed in his message, Federal Law prohibits our sharing any details of the alleged incident or any other student-specific information. I want you to know that our department works diligently to encourage conduct that properly reflects the values of our university. Ron Wellman Director of Athletics Dear members of the Wake Forest community, It is my understanding that on Thursday, NBC's Today Show plans to air a story about the problem of sexual assault on college and university campuses. We have been advised by a producer of the Today Show that the story will include an interview with a former Wake Forest student involving an incident that occurred several years ago. I am aware that some members of the local news media have received an email purporting to provide information about that incident. I have also recently learned that this same email may have been circulated more broadly, and some members of our Wake Forest community may have received it in their personal email accounts. Regarding this matter, I must emphasize that Federal law (FERPA) prevents the University from discussing specifics of this or any other student case. I can assure you the University takes these issues seriously, has a well-established Code of Conduct and has procedures for hearing alleged violations of that Code of Conduct. In addition, Wake Forest offers significant resources to support our students in times of need. Fostering a positive and respectful living and learning environment is of paramount importance at Wake Forest University. As part of our Pro Humanitate mission we strive to treat all of our students with integrity and compassion. Rest assured that the University is taking appropriate action to respond to this matter. Sincerely, Nathan Hatch President

What about the other 49?

Parties involved in contracts do not set legal precedent. Judges do that when they decide cases and case law is established.

To be honest, I wish we'd have received more media coverage last season. Knowing the media would question UA decision-makers would put pressure on those people to do better. With no media coverage in bad times, there's no accountability. I don't disagree. However, they get what they deserve. Between the Browns, Indians (last year) and the Cavs, how many more negative stories can they put in the paper? People and the writers who write the stories can only take so much. I don't think negative articles in the paper drive coaches or ADs to do a better job. They are going to do what they do and it isn't a secret to them when the team is 0-8. Akron is a stepping stone to the next level. The coaches and administration know full well 0-8 doesn't get you to the next level. Want to put pressure on the team? It has to come from the high dollar donors. The people in the Athletic Department will care more when high dollar donors care more. The folks at Summa and InfoCision have to demand more.

You make a good point here. A major factor in making a story newsworthy is whether or not there is anything different about the current story than a past story. Specifically as related to Zips basketball, the story is largely the same over the past six years. In order to change that, you are right, they need some big wins against known teams and they can't fall in OOC teams against teams they shouldn't fall to. The bar has been rightly set high for Zips basketball by fans and the media. That's actually a good thing. If the Zips football team started out a season 3-1 with a win against a BCS level team, it would be a story. If the Zips start the season 3-1 and then are 3-4 after their next three games, they are no longer a story and don't deserve to be a story. They need to get winning.... and after they get winning, they need to win some more. Going 6-6 and making the Motor City Bowl is not a story except in the world of Terry Pluto, because the little guy is getting awarded for doing something incredibly average. We all know we would be one and done in the the Terry Pluto column world. Going 8-4 or 9-3, winning against a BCS level team and winning the MAC is a story even if it ends in the Motor City Bowl. Then the Zips need to do the same thing again the following year....and then the following year...and then the following year. As far as tOSU, it doesn't matter what they do if we don't do what we need to do to make ourselves a story. We get exactly the coverage in the local media we deserve for a team that went 1-11 last season.

I didn't get the memo on when we should start calling taxpayers "donors". Isn't this sort of like calling taxes "contributions"? One point nobody has brought up yet is the fact the case is filed in Portage County. Does anyone think an elected judge in Portage County is going to do anything other than side with Can't on this issue? I don't think it will go to any type of trial, but if it did, Bradley would lose badly (sort of rhymes...channeling my inner Jesse Jackson today I guess).

I don't know about all of that, but thanks for posting Mr. Limbaugh. I just think it would be a good thing to congratulate the President, the Seals and everyone involved for finally killing a guy we said 10 years ago we would catch or kill. The lack of Patriotism by Republicans is sad in this case. After all, aren't they the ones who told everyone they were un-Patriotic if they didn't support the misguided war in Iraq? Now that something meaningful has been accomplished long after they are out of the White House, they want to claim credit. It's beyone pathetic to just plain sad.

It seems to me that Brad thinks they are in the right as well. We seem to be omitting those quotes in the posts in this tread. These coaches get very good legal representation when they sign contracts. Words like "buyout" are nothing new to the coaches or lawyers. It was probably the first thing they looked at. I'd be highly surprised is Ford has to take a dime out of his own pocket to pay the amount. The previous coaches probably didn't have their buyout money sitting in their checking accounts when their buyouts were paid within two weeks. Brad is doing the right thing by going to court. In fact, they claim to be in the right. If they lose, they pay the buyout, which may not bother them. Less than the buyout is even better if they can settle out of court. All I know is this. I hope this case goes on for a couple of years.

I agree, it isn't their "responsibility. It is the responsibility of the Zips to make the team newsworthy. Winning is a good way to make a team newsworthy.