Jump to content

Akron's Rob Ianello


Zip Watcher

Recommended Posts

We would have had to pay out the rear to get a big name. I see the point about a FCS up and comer but that is no safe bet either. At this point I am satisfied because...
Maybe we did, I haven't heard any salary mentioned. And since no one has mentioned it, look what happened last time we took a coach from Notre Dame. That has exactly zero bearing on the current situation but I can't believe no one used that one yet. :)If Tom is right, we're all happy. If he's wrong, it will likely cost him his job down the road. I'm sure this was not something he entered into lightly. Gotta give Rob a chance.And JohnnyZip84, I can't believe you got that job after they called me as a reference, were any of the other candidates breathing? :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Brief Ohio.Com article (presumably Gaffney).And just for Dr. Z:
He also wants to play a 4-3 defensive scheme.
It is sad that I'm happy about that comment, but I am. Choosing the proper scheme is step ONE of ten that Rob has to do to have a dominating defense at Akron. Good luck, I like his start.PS He looks good in that cap. zfoot_2A.JPG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring back Balki Bartokomous! Where'd he go anyway? :lol:
At last report, the ZipsNation.Org search party is still on its mission started to Put-in-Bay a few years ago in search of DA ZIPMAN!You'll have to wait to find Balki .. priorties.
DA ZIPMAN! :rofl: I'm sure a few pearls of wisdom from him would make my day! :horse:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DA ZIPMAN! :rofl: I'm sure a few pearls of wisdom from him would make my day! :horse:
Hilltopper, Da Zipman just emailed me and asked to post his comment. He said this applies to all football related threads, not just this one:DA COACHES SUCK, DA PLAYERS ARE DA BOMBDA ZIPMAN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would have had to pay out the rear to get a big name. I see the point about a FCS up and comer but that is no safe bet either. At this point I am satisfied because...
Maybe we did, I haven't heard any salary mentioned. And since no one has mentioned it, look what happened last time we took a coach from Notre Dame. That has exactly zero bearing on the current situation but I can't believe no one used that one yet. :)If Tom is right, we're all happy. If he's wrong, it will likely cost him his job down the road. I'm sure this was not something he entered into lightly. Gotta give Rob a chance.And JohnnyZip84, I can't believe you got that job after they called me as a reference, were any of the other candidates breathing? :)
I'm pretty sure that I beat out a "Chuck Martin" for the gig. It's probably ANOTHER Chuk Martin though :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks...I'll trust the AD on this call.
What has he done to earn your trust?
What has he done to lose your's?GP1.gif
Trust isn't given, it's earned.1. Reno raw deal.2. Taking the easy road and hiring a buddy.3. Giving away tickets to the final football game.Now go cry to the moderators and have them make you another sign, sign bitch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks...I'll trust the AD on this call.
What has he done to earn your trust?
What has he done to lose your's?GP1.gif
lolI'm gonna stick up for GP1 here (I can't believe it).I don't think trust can be lost if it was never had.Don't confuse trust with respect. I think the AP automatically deserves respect, unless he does something to lose it.I also think that I would like to have faith that he knows what he is doing.But trust? That's a rough one.I tend to be an optimist. And like I said when the Ianello rumor thread started, IF (and I don't know that it is true, whatsoever) our new HC is brought in for his recruiting prowess and leadership vision, and may lack the X's & O's, then all the AD has to do is complete the organizational package around him to (look out for it) "build the program" and fill in those gaps.[edit-add]BTW, GP1, I'm sure you don't see it this way, but I think that the sign is a tribute to you.Don't focus on it's negative aspect. I understand why it was made. Frankly, your style hasn't always been my favorite either.But I am jealous that got a sign made to you. I got no sign, and if smart guy makes me one, it certainly wont get used often. :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

..... When the real issue is that said Ianello has been a recruiter for the past twenty years at several institutions.That speaks volumes about his personal skills and recruiting abilities. Here, here. On the flip side, twentyyears in the same position. Pretty stagnant as far as developing other coaching skills.Paul ("Bear") Bryant was one of Alabama's greatest football coaches, if not the outright greatest. Bryantcouldn't coach his way to the men's room. He relied on the best talented assistants he could hire. HopefullyIanello has similar skills .....
Bingo. Every coach has strengths and weaknesses. Pick your poison. Ianello is universally recognized as one of college football's best recruiters. That means his weaknesses are in other areas. Great head coaches such as Bear Bryant played to their strengths, recognized their weaknesses, and compensated by surrounding themselves with assistants whose strengths covered their weaknesses.If Ianello focuses on his strength of attracting the best recruits UA could realistically hope for, brings in a strong supporting cast of assistants, and makes all the right moves with those chess pieces, he will be a winner. The same formula would apply to any head coach that UA might have signed. There are no guarantees of who would be best at putting together all the pieces needed. But at least with Ianello UA is getting a coach with a long history of being at the top of his particular specialty -- recruiting. That's a great start.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks...I'll trust the AD on this call.
What has he done to earn your trust?
1.) He actually interviewed the candidates, rather than only look at won/lost records on a school's web site, or idiotic comments on fan forums. 2.) He didn't look at Central Michigan and think "This is the only possible way to have success in the MAC."3.) He released a coaching staff that was still under contract for a year. In these economic times, he could easily have said "Hey, my hands are tied...we have to keep the guy." But he made the tough (monetarily) call. 4.) His own career advancement depends on it.Look - I have a long way to go before I buy into YouTube Tom part-and-parcel. The way he handled Reno's dismissal was absolutely wrong and he has a mile to go to make up for it. But he knows better than anyone on this board whether or not Ianello was the best candidate for the Akron HC job.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he knows better than anyone on this board whether or not Ianello was the best candidate for the Akron HC job. His own career advancement depends on it.
VERY hard to argue with that line of reasoning.He ought to know better than anyone on this board regardless, but that's not the point. There is no greater factor to consider than human nature, and it's hard to imagine that he would make a bad decision when it would obviously be self-destructive.The only question I would ask is, how much was he limited by things out of his own control, such as money limitations, for one example.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks...I'll trust the AD on this call.
What has he done to earn your trust?
What has he done to lose your's?GP1.gif
lolI'm gonna stick up for GP1 here (I can't believe it).I don't think trust can be lost if it was never had.Don't confuse trust with respect. I think the AP automatically deserves respect, unless he does something to lose it.I also think that I would like to have faith that he knows what he is doing.But trust? That's a rough one.I tend to be an optimist. And like I said when the Ianello rumor thread started, IF (and I don't know that it is true, whatsoever) our new HC is brought in for his recruiting prowess and leadership vision, and may lack the X's & O's, then all the AD has to do is complete the organizational package around him to (look out for it) "build the program" and fill in those gaps.[edit-add]BTW, GP1, I'm sure you don't see it this way, but I think that the sign is a tribute to you.Don't focus on it's negative aspect. I understand why it was made. Frankly, your style hasn't always been my favorite either.But I am jealous that got a sign made to you. I got no sign, and if smart guy makes me one, it certainly wont get used often. :lol:
First, trust is given and lost, because trust is a form of faith. A belief that a person will come through. You don't earn it.Second, GP1 is a big boy and knows when people mess with him, or just flat out think he's talking out his @$$. And likely doesn't care either way. I've agreed with him before, and I'm just having fun with my sign.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks...I'll trust the AD on this call.
What has he done to earn your trust?
1.) He actually interviewed the candidates, rather than only look at won/lost records on a school's web site, or idiotic comments on fan forums. 2.) He didn't look at Central Michigan and think "This is the only possible way to have success in the MAC."3.) He released a coaching staff that was still under contract for a year. In these economic times, he could easily have said "Hey, my hands are tied...we have to keep the guy." But he made the tough (monetarily) call. 4.) His own career advancement depends on it.Look - I have a long way to go before I buy into YouTube Tom part-and-parcel. The way he handled Reno's dismissal was absolutely wrong and he has a mile to go to make up for it. But he knows better than anyone on this board whether or not Ianello was the best candidate for the Akron HC job.
Below is my rebuttal to your strained logic (number correspond to numbers above):1. Isn't it his job to interview the candidates. Why does that deserve respect?2. I guess you have a point there.3. Making obvious choices does not deserve respect. It's like saying Mike Thomas was brilliant for hiring Kelly when in fact it was the obvious choice.4. People in college athletics advance their careers in all sorts of ways. One of those is hiring their friends so incase they need another job they have their friends to fall back on. I think this is lazy management.Maybe it's my natural dislike for authority and honestly it is still early in his UofA career, but the guy makes me nervous in a way that Mack and Thomas didn't. I think he is a ready...fire...aim guy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For whoever asked earlier, UA was willing to pony up somewhere in the $329k-$379k range for a coach. How much is he really getting, I don't know.
So, an average MAC salary. At the same time, Central Michigan is prepared to pony up 600k a year to keep Butch Jones from leaving.
Coaches that have proven themselves (allegedly...we'll see how the guy does w/o MAC-killer LeFevour) tend to get more money than 1st year guys.We also don't know Ianello's salary yet. I'm sure I won't see him shaking an old McDonald's cup outside The Q.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disappointed in that salary. If he shows success in the first year I would hope that his contract is reworked. The MAC salary crapper is simply embarassing and goes a long way toward explaining why (1) the teams generally stink and (2) reasonably successful coaches vamoosh the first second they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also don't know Ianello's salary yet. I'm sure I won't see him shaking an old McDonald's cup outside The Q.
"According to Wistrcill, Ianello will make $375,000 a year on his initial five-year pact and will have $800,000 at his disposal to hire a staff."nbc_the_more_you_know.jpg
That's very scary: in the same paragraph, it says "Ianello will become the second Notre Dame football coach to be head man for the Zips, following in the footsteps of Gerry Faust (43-53-3, 1986-1994)."A sign of things to come?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he knows better than anyone on this board whether or not Ianello was the best candidate for the Akron HC job. His own career advancement depends on it.
VERY hard to argue with that line of reasoning.He ought to know better than anyone on this board regardless, but that's not the point. There is no greater factor to consider than human nature, and it's hard to imagine that he would make a bad decision when it would obviously be self-destructive.The only question I would ask is, how much was he limited by things out of his own control, such as money limitations, for one example.
Me and my golfing buddy (let's just call him T.W. for the moment) couldn't agree more with your human nature comment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...