Jump to content

2015 MAC Tournament Watch


UAZip0510

Recommended Posts

I've also thought about this over the last week or so.

There could be a real benefit to playing on Mon. and Wed. in the MAC Tourney.

1) More chances to get to 20+ wins.

2) More postseason experience for the youngsters.

I hate to be talking about a nearly impossible road to a Saturday title game, but those are the cards we've been dealt.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There could be a real benefit to playing on Mon. and Wed. in the MAC Tourney. 1) More chances to get to 20+ wins

19 or 20 wins, if neither meant a bid to a tournament, what is the difference? I see zero benefit for the team. I get that it's fun for a few fans to try to justify some of their arguments, but that's about it. Postseason experience for this young(er) team would be very beneficial. It's just too bad it would be without Noah. With the way this team shoots, I hold little hope for post season success. I would love to be proven wrong. I saw a banner for the MAC tourney during an outside shot last night during the Cavs game. That got my blood pumping.

If no type of tournament were involved, one could argue that 19 wins may actually be better than 20 for the future success of this team and staff. It might place a sense of urgency around the program, as opposed to complacency that it seems to be mired in. Doubt it, but it's possible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 or 20 wins, if neither meant a bid to a tournament, what is the difference? I see zero benefit for the team. I get that it's fun for a few fans to try to justify some of their arguments, but that's about it. ...

Right, this

Zips are one of only eight programs with at least 21-plus wins in each of the last eight seasons (Akron, Duke, Florida, Gonzaga, Kansas, Ohio State, Pittsburgh and Syracuse)

has nothing to do with this

Gorman’s Robotham chooses Akron

“I built my career on winning, and they have 20-plus wins every year,” Robotham said. “That’s something I’m used to doing, and I don’t plan on changing.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, I think the above post helps prove my point.

I know who they are. Maybe you're giving them to much credit? I just don't think they are very good, and I tend to pull mightily for the non-power conference teams. I'd love to get a matchup like that if I were a #13 coming out of the MAC. Their lack of experience on a bigger stage is also added advantage to being their opponent.

Todays Yahoo Sports Headline: Interpretive Dance: Little giant Northern Iowa a legit Final Four contender

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, I think the above post helps prove my point.

Todays Yahoo Sports Headline: Interpretive Dance: Little giant Northern Iowa a legit Final Four contender

So, I should have a more favorable opinion of their chances at a title run, just because a Yahoo sportswriter feels that they do?

Again, I will pull for them, big time. I like what they represent. But, as I stated, if I were a #13 MAC team, I'd love that matchup!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, I think the above post helps prove my point. ...

Sadly, maybe one of us is missing the other's point. You said winning 20 games had no more benefit for the team than winning 19. Recruiting is important to the team. Noah is the most important recruit the Zips have landed in years. Noah publicly stated that a major reason why he chose UA over other schools is because the Zips "have 20-plus wins every year." Ergo, continuing the streak of 20-plus win seasons does have a benefit for the team in recruiting quality players like Noah who are attracted by the prospect of winning 20-plus games every year. It's a small psychological factor. But UA needs every little factor in its favor that can be mustered to try to attract quality players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know the possible scenarios, as unlikely as they may be. But don't forget the MAC West:

If CMU loses their last three games and the Zips win their last two, both would have 11-7 records and the Zips own the tiebreaker by virtue of winning the only game between the two teams this season

If Toledo loses their last three games and the Zips win their final two, the Zips finish 11-7 to UT's 10-8.

We'll know at the end of this evening if either of those unlikely possibilities is still in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know the possible scenarios, as unlikely as they may be. But don't forget the MAC West:

If CMU loses their last three games and the Zips win their last two, both would have 11-7 records and the Zips own the tiebreaker by virtue of winning the only game between the two teams this season

If Toledo loses their last three games and the Zips win their final two, the Zips finish 11-7 to UT's 10-8.

We'll know at the end of this evening if either of those unlikely possibilities is still in play.

Good call on CMU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo (11-5) has beaten Ball State, so the best the Zips can do now is tie them at 11-7, and UT owns the tie-breaker. Buffalo (10-6) has beaten Can't (10-6), 71-65, which is an OK result as they're both now just one game ahead of the Zips. And NIU is surprisingly stomping CMU at halftime, 33-20, which is good for the Zips. So the situation is still fluid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) 11-5 - Central Michigan - Remaining: Toledo, at WMU

2) 11-5 - Toledo - Remaining: at CMU, at EMU.

3) 11-5 - Bowling Green - Remaining: Can't, at Buffalo.

4) 10-6 - Buffalo - Remaining: Ohio, BG

5) 10-6 - Can't State - Remaining: at BG, Akron

6) 9-7 - Akron - Remaining: at Miami, at Can't

7) 9-7 - Western Michigan - Remaining: at NIU, CMU

8) 7-9 - Miami

9) 6-10 - Eastern Michigan

10) 6-10 - Northern Illinois

11) 4-12 - Ohio

12) 2-14 - Ball State

If Akron beats Miami, things start to get very, very interesting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to wrap my head around this:

We beat Miami, BG beats Can't, we beat Can't

We are 11-7, Can't is 10-6, we move up

BG beats Buffalo, they are also 10-6

BG and Ohio beat Buffalo, they are 10-6

CMU beats UT and WMU, they are 13-5

UT is beat by EMU, they are 11-7

WMU is no better than 10-6

SO

That scenario leaves us behind CMU, tied with UT. I think we would get the fourth seed????

Now I have a headache.

IF we win out, we are 11-7

That WILL put us ahead of Can't.

Never mind, this is way too complicated. Let's just win out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...