Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, catdaddyp said:

Finally has a really good game and hits the door….

I guess the question is: will one good game translate into a better situation and some money??

Posted
4 hours ago, Blue & Gold said:

We spend $$$ and 3 years developing him & he has one good game for us and leaves.

 

That's the sad reality of college sports. It's no different than Major League Baseball and why I freaking HATE P5 and major conference schools.  

 

You have two tiers of teams and we're just the farm system for bigger schools now. We develop the athletes and they have the money to poach them away.

 

Maybe every few years a small school can make a run in the CFP or March Madness. But by the next year that program will be completely gutted and will have to start from scratch. 

  • Like 2
Posted
55 minutes ago, akzipper said:

 

That's the sad reality of college sports. It's no different than Major League Baseball and why I freaking HATE P5 and major conference schools.  

 

You have two tiers of teams and we're just the farm system for bigger schools now. We develop the athletes and they have the money to poach them away.

The most criminal part is - they can steal your best players with zero restitution. In any professional sport you need to pay, or make a trade to land a coveted player from another team. In college football you just take them for free. We are a free minor league for the P5 programs...must be nice.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, akzipper said:

 

That's the sad reality of college sports. It's no different than Major League Baseball and why I freaking HATE P5 and major conference schools.  

 

You have two tiers of teams and we're just the farm system for bigger schools now. We develop the athletes and they have the money to poach them away.

 

Maybe every few years a small school can make a run in the CFP or March Madness. But by the next year that program will be completely gutted and will have to start from scratch. 

And historically small schools success with March Madness has depended on having more team chemistry from four years of developing the same players in the same system, despite their being smaller, less athletic, etc. That opportunity has been wiped away. Also, football revenues now directly fund NIL for basketball players. Hence why the last men's NCAAT was dominated by the "Big Ten" and SEC...that's where all the football money is so they simply buy the basketball players.

Posted
10 minutes ago, UAZipster0305 said:

And historically small schools success with March Madness has depended on having more team chemistry from four years of developing the same players in the same system, despite their being smaller, less athletic, etc. That opportunity has been wiped away. Also, football revenues now directly fund NIL for basketball players. Hence why the last men's NCAAT was dominated by the "Big Ten" and SEC...that's where all the football money is so they simply buy the basketball players.

 

It's not just football revenue. It's TV money as well. Even though football is the biggest revenue generator, basketball is still great for them to fill time slots on SEC or B1G networks. Basketball pays for itself. It's the other sports that football subsidizes. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...