You think UA didn't do a thorough economic analysis of the cost of the buyout vs. the cost of continuing to lose games and paying fans? Okey-dokey.
Listen, the cost of an Ianello buyout has been a popular subject of discussion on ZN.o for months.
A month ago, when many on ZN.o were saying UA would never eat a significant portion of Ianello's contract, I posted a dissenting opinion here.
A few days ago a link to the contract was posted, and when some were still saying it was too rich to eat, I simply pointed out that it would not be as costly as some were thinking.
It was a typical forum discussion that some found interesting and others didn't.
There's no reason for anyone to obsess over it, pro or con.
what's done is done, let's get Paul Winters now if we can't get Jim Tressel.