Ham

There is no question that our pass rush sucks; however personnel may not be the only problem. Even in obvious passing situations, we were reluctant to rush 5. Were we trying to protect a weak secondary? This is a chicken or egg dilemma. Catdaddyp has repeatedly pointed out the stark difference in completion percentages when under pressure. Maybe next year, we will trust our man coverage, and commit more to the rush.

Do you think OSU, SC, and Rutgers are taking a win off their record? Negative Nannies are real tiring.

As a former DE, Nunnally's sack for the win!

I have not watched a down of Kent this year; however l don't think they are as bad as it seems. We will have a fight on our hands. Will we jab jab jab; or will we kick ass and take numbers? I think we will be taking numbers! Let's see some balance. Run the damn ball 30 times. I don't care if they stack 9 at the line; all the better to break the big ones.

Captain, you are correct. We have been loosing games rather than our opponents winning them. Expecting to win contributes to the focus needed to win not only the game but also each play. The muffed punt pretty much ended the last game. We will see in a few hours if the team can put that behind them.

GAME DAY! Wake up people. I think the Zips will carry their last 4th quarter performance into this game. It will be a shoot out. Zips 41 / Husky's 38.

I'm glad you are starting to come around.

Negative Nancy's, you are tiring! I saw a team that could have rolled over and played dead come off the mat to have a chance in the end. Mistakes are killers. We need to clean them up . Please come forward if you have any ideas to work on cleaning up our game. Talent difference? I think we could see that in our OOC games, but not in MAC play. What do you expect? Winning for sure. Over coming the beat down OOC schedule is harder than you think. For me, our 4th quarter play was very encouraging. It could be the spark that will turn things around.

A couple penalties perplexed me. I thought you needed to point the weapon at an opponent to be penalized. The unsportsmanlike call for pulling an opponent off the pile was real weak. At least on those 2 calls, l felt the officials were looking for a chance to throw the flag. Bullock was on the field quite a bit, but l would like to see more of that. I think a DB would have a hard time with Bullock. On the D, l think l would rush a LB more( even though that contributed to an 81yrd gain). Line play on both sides has improved. I hope we can keep these guys in the trenches and out of the portal (as well as our skill players).

close enough.

GP1 must be thinking about Wake. Zips win. 27 - 20

Are you guys that old? (American football fan that drops in to get a dose of winning.)

It worked for Ted Lasso

This was my first and probably only game I've seen in person. It was easy to see why our RB's don't get many carries at least in this game. BG was packing it in for most every play. For that reason, l give the coaches a poor grade. I don't think RPO works too well when the D is over loaded. When we ran a quick hitter, we had success in spite of the D crowding the line of scrimmage. We didn't need to throw long; we just needed to throw over the LB's. On D, our aggressiveness cost us. Missed tackles led to chunk plays. If the team keeps focused, they can turn this season around. Well get to 4 maybe 5 wins.

Zips win. 31--24