The World of College Football

[GP1]

1 hour ago, exit322 said:

UCLA and Virginia Tech decided today keeping their failed head coaches was more costly than getting rid of them.  So I guess it's doable even when UCLA's stadium was 80% empty.  Wild.

Schools like this have much more in their calculations. Akron just has money. Either they can afford to fire Joe, or not. 

[Dr Z]

On 9/9/2025 at 5:52 PM, kreed5120 said:

...Ohio is good enough to lose by only 28 instead of 33...

Nice call. 😎

[MangoZip]

Spring transfer portal removed

 

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-approves-single-transfer-portal-window-how-the-new-rule-will-impact-college-football/#

[GP1]

9 hours ago, MangoZip said:

Spring transfer portal removed

 

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-approves-single-transfer-portal-window-how-the-new-rule-will-impact-college-football/#

This is a good step. Next step should be reducing scholarships to 65. College football is now a professional minor league. If 53 players per roster is good enough for the NFL, college can do the same thing. It will make coaches really think about who and who does not get a scholarship. One half of all kids in the TP never play football again. It will also accelerate them out of the sport and move them to things they can do on life where they can be more successful.  

Edited 4 hours ago by GP1

[kreed5120]

21 minutes ago, GP1 said:

This is a good step. Next step should be reducing scholarships to 65. College football is now a professional minor league. If 53 players per roster is good enough for the NFL, college can do the same thing. It will make coaches really think about who and who does not get a scholarship. One half of all kids in the TP never play football again. It will also accelerate them out of the spirit and move them to things they can do on life where they can be more successful.  

 

My complaint with the transfer portal is that it's open during the CFP. They should move the window to early February IMO. Trimming it down to 1 window was a big improvement.

 

I feel a little bit more study needs to be done to determine proper roster size. NFL teams have roster size of 53, but they have an additional 17 player taxi squad, who they have on hand to step in when needed. Plus they can sign FA mid-season. An NFL team uses much more than 53 individual players over the course of the season when you factor in injuries. I would think 70-75 players would be adequate and accomplish some of the goals you stated.

[MangoZip]

25 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

My complaint with the transfer portal is that it's open during the CFP. They should move the window to early February IMO. Trimming it down to 1 window was a big improvement.

 

I feel a little bit more study needs to be done to determine proper roster size. NFL teams have roster size of 53, but they have an additional 17 player taxi squad, who they have on hand to step in when needed. Plus they can sign FA mid-season. An NFL team uses much more than 53 individual players over the course of the season when you factor in injuries. I would think 70-75 players would be adequate and accomplish some of the goals you stated.

I would agree it makes more sense for football but the problem is classes. Most schools start 2nd semester until early to mid January so kids needs to be enrolled. If they aren’t enrolled for 2nd semester then they can’t participate in spring practice. 

Edited 4 hours ago by MangoZip

[GP1]

29 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

My complaint with the transfer portal is that it's open during the CFP. They should move the window to early February IMO. Trimming it down to 1 window was a big improvement.

 

I feel a little bit more study needs to be done to determine proper roster size. NFL teams have roster size of 53, but they have an additional 17 player taxi squad, who they have on hand to step in when needed. Plus they can sign FA mid-season. An NFL team uses much more than 53 individual players over the course of the season when you factor in injuries. I would think 70-75 players would be adequate and accomplish some of the goals you stated.

70 is probably a better number than my original. They could have 53 scholarships and 17 walk ons. 

 

It wouldn't take much time. They could chart the number of plays per player on every roster. Some players may only play a handful of plays in a season. I believe those players are unnecessary to give scholarships. 

 

A lot of NFL players are brought in n mid season to replace IR players or guys who aren't cutting it. Injuries are part of sports. Teams will need to deal with those problems with their available roster. Life isn't fair. 

[ZippyRulz]

4 hours ago, GP1 said:

This is a good step. Next step should be reducing scholarships to 65. College football is now a professional minor league. If 53 players per roster is good enough for the NFL, college can do the same thing. It will make coaches really think about who and who does not get a scholarship. One half of all kids in the TP never play football again. It will also accelerate them out of the sport and move them to things they can do on life where they can be more successful.  

 

Scholarship limits and roster limits are 2 different things. Limiting scholarships would have no bearing on the P4.

 

[GP1]

17 minutes ago, ZippyRulz said:

 

Scholarship limits and roster limits are 2 different things. Limiting scholarships would have no bearing on the P4.

 

Good point. Limit them anyhow. Let private money pay for it.