Blue & Gold Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago Whoever runs this account has the easiest job in the world. Depressing... but easy. 1 Quote
GP1 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 11 hours ago, kreed5120 said: Honestly any money we would save dropping to FCS is probably negated by lost revenue. Non-scholaship FCS or D2 would probably be where things would start making mathematical sense. If we just wait a few more years, G5 may have it's own division below FBS. By doing so, we can save a good MBB program and very good soccer program. 1 Quote
GP1 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, Blue & Gold said: We simply can't be this bad in Year 4 😞 How good should one of the most under resourced programs be? Seriously, I think that's an interesting question. Losing is one thing. A program completely devoid of any entertainment value is something completely different. 1 Quote
Lee Adams Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, GP1 said: If we just wait a few more years, G5 may have it's own division below FBS. By doing so, we can save a good MBB program and very good soccer program. Not about 'saving money' after lierally decades of this. They have to play at a level where they can be consistently competitive. Now they are not. 1 Quote
Lee Adams Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 15 hours ago, exit322 said: Honestly, I debated whether FCS or Division 2 was the better call. Wherever they can be competitive. Think they could compete against the S.Dakota, N.Dakota and Montana teams among others, in FCS? Personally I would question that also. 1 Quote
GP1 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 47 minutes ago, Lee Adams said: Not about 'saving money' after lierally decades of this. They have to play at a level where they can be consistently competitive. Now they are not. You're right, it's not about the money. The central question is whether or not they want to be in the MAC. If that answer is no, it puts a lot of pressure on other programs that are performing well. The other question is, who would want Akron and why? If the answer is yes, they need to figure out how to get more competitive in 2026 and beyond. Quote
Blue & Gold Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 7 hours ago, GP1 said: How good should one of the most under resourced programs be? Seriously, I think that's an interesting question. Losing is one thing. A program completely devoid of any entertainment value is something completely different. And with our best players leaving via the TP every year what else should we expect? With the current state of college football I think the best we can hope for is the possibility of catching lightning in a bottle once in a while. Edited 1 hour ago by Blue & Gold Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.