Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, exit322 said:

 

If Dustin Ford had a 27% win percentage over four years exacerbated by a recruiting screwup where the only other options available have 17 shots attempted in their combined college careers, and all of the offseason camp was used to get the ineligible guys ready until the actual preseason started, taking away valuable reps from the guys who have that combined 17 shots in their college career...Yeah, it would.  This isn't a one-off "well, we tried" like those two guys and Ford.  This is just another piece in what's turning into a rather long pattern of Moorhead just not being a very good hire.

If those two guys don't make it with Ford?  He's still got a team that's going to be playing on Friday in Cleveland at worst.

Now with Broughton and/or Roggow (unless they're actually good...in which case why are we taking their reps away for a potentially ineligible guy who hasn't actually played in three years), Akron's quite possibly looking at 2-10 in the face again.

BUT - Tonight is the beginning of a new season, and I desperately hope I'm wrong.

 

I would say another 4-8 season would be the fireable offense, not this particular situation. Although even at 4-8 IDK if the program has money to pay a buyout while also paying for a new coach. A chance we would have to ride out the contract irregardless if it doesn't pan out.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

When your a program like Akron, who has the 2nd lowest football budget in all of FBS, you have to take chances. Even if they thought there was a 50% chance of getting him another year, but viewed him as a massive upgrade over any other player they could have potentially landed it would be worth the risk.

 

Right now Akron basketball, based off Rothstein tweet, has 2 players seeking a 5th year of eligibility. Both of which would probably be Zips starters next season if they get a 5th year. That said, if both get denied then I don't think anyone would try to claim that as a fireable offense for Dustin Ford.

Think this is a fair take, but if there’s only a 50% chance and you don’t bring in somebody else with experience, the other QBs on the roster better be able to perform. I think all the other guys have potential an am intrigued to see them, but they have next to no game experience.

Edited by LZIp
Posted
3 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

I would say another 4-8 season would be the fireable offense, not this particular situation. Although even at 4-8 IDK if the program has money to pay a buyout while also paying for a new coach. A chance we would have to ride out the contract irregardless if it doesn't pan out.

 

To be fair, this is the more correct answer.  Joe's not leaving until his contract is up, or he finds an OC job somewhere.  It would not be a good business decision to fire Joe, though you're getting darn close to "are we better in the community without him and that cash than with him" with another 4-8 season.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, LZIp said:

Think this is a fair take, but if there’s only a 50% chance and you don’t bring in somebody else with experience, the other QBs on the roster better be able to perform.

 

I feel we're going to learn a bit about that in a couple hours.  As screwy as this has been, I wouldn't be shocked if Broughton/Roggow (whoever starts) is actually reasonably OK

Edited by exit322
Posted
1 hour ago, Zippy87 said:

 

I need to get the full story before I react, but I definitely think fans deserve an explanation on what is happening. 

From BroBible:

 

"[...]Well, a group of outgoing seniors filed a federal lawsuit in Colorado to receive their fifth year of eligibility. They were granted a blanket waiver that would allow them to play in the upcoming season. Poffenbarger was considered eligible under that ruling. He got a redshirt year and four years of eligibility. This would be his “fifth” (really sixth) season.

It seemed like he was going to play for Akron during the 2026 college football season until Aug 21, when the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the NCAA a stay. The stay halted the original judge’s order, reversed the initial eligibility ruling and closed the door for outgoing seniors to return for a fifth season. They are out of eligibility.

It is assumed that Poffenbarger is not eligible as a result of the stay. However, individual athletes are able to seek eligibility through outside legal filings beyond the blanket waiver that was originally applied to all athletes.[...]"

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

We have some pretty young OL out there. 
 

you can tell Broughton is athletic. Not going to last long taking some of those hits though. 

Edited by LZIp
Posted

I would love for Moorhead to take some chances every now and then. They're playing this to minimize the final deficit versus actually trying to pull off an upset. 

 

Like, 4th and 5 around midfield, we send the offense out, take a penalty, punt, and then - very predictably- let them march down the field and score. 

 

I thought his brand of football was going to be fun when he arrived. But it's so uninspiring. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Zippy87 said:

I thought his brand of football was going to be fun when he arrived. But it's so uninspiring. 

 

"Joe Moorhead, an inspirational leader of student-athletes and one of the most ingenious offensive minds in football, was named the head coach of The University of Akron football program on Dec. 4, 2021."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...