Some people are never happy. Since the Huggins era, the program hasn't had anything to hang its hat on...until KD turned things around. To me, the 20+ win seasons aren't that remarkable given our especially week out-of-conference schedule and no marque match-ups at home. However, we have gone dancing, played in the CBI and NIT, won an NIT game, and have been in the MACC game 4 years in a row.
What is our precedent for judging KD's success? UA standards? As I already said, KD has made this program as good as it has ever been! Huggins didn't even win an NCAA Tournament game in his tenure here. The highest MAC standards? Other than Can't's run in the NCAA Tournament many years ago and a few others in the distant past (Ball State and Miami, I think), what program from the MAC has had sustained national-level success? None.
So, let's be realistic here. KD deserves nothing less than our continued support for another 3 years. The grass is not always greener on the other side. We could replace KD thinking we are upgrading only to have the program slide back to MAC-level mediocrity.
If we have a good, exciting week in Cleveland and make the final (and maybe even the NCAA Tournament), you will all be back on KD's bandwagon. Look back on my post then and know that I never left the bandwagon.