No, my first sentence was in response to the second sentence in your post: A conference doesn't "sponsor" a sport.
The literal verbiage used by the MAC was "sponsor," hence why I used the term "sponsor."
I'm well aware the conference can't force its members to carry a sport. However, this isn't equestrian, field hockey, or other obscure sports like that. This is soccer - the world's sport - in which they have a perennial national contender as a member. They're also close to dropping Track & Field, which they have a perennial national contender as a member. They don't sponsor men's hockey either, which 2-3 of their full time members are national contender in. I don't know how good the swimming & diving is as a conference, and I don't know about any other sports in which their full time members have a program that is a perennial national contender (i.e. OU volleyball). I won't bring up rifle cause that's incredibly obscure (although I'm damn proud that Akron could shoot the nuts off a squirrel at 50m).
Yes, I hate the MAC. You're right, that is well documented. I think it's also pretty well supported by the constant failure by the MAC to grow, become an attractive G5 conference for other schools to be full members, and support its current list of members, especially when it comes to their best sports.
What is a D1 conference without men's soccer and soon to be Track & Field? That's pathetic.
Also, regarding the game, WMU embarrassed us and earned their NCAA tournament appearance. Congrats to them.