Jump to content

clarkwgriswold

Members
  • Posts

    10,044
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    361

Everything posted by clarkwgriswold

  1. Unfortunately, I think the NCAA is right. I don't see how DeWine has the power to impose this on the NCAA.
  2. Here's the summary and the order. I suspect it allows the universities to play the kids but I don't see how it could limit the NCAA from excluding them from the tournament, etc. Seems like an overstep by DeWine. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine today signed Executive Order 2026-04D which gives Ohio’s public and private colleges and universities the option to allow all otherwise eligible student-athletes from the high school class of 2022 to compete despite the NCAA’s current interpretation of its new eligibility rule. https://governor.ohio.gov/media/news-and-media/governor-dewine-signs-executive-order-addressing-college-athlete-eligibility
  3. All good points. I think you start Broughton as he gives you more options on offense.
  4. Well, a great punter maybe from all of the experience he gets.
  5. Some dumb football. Illegal snap; not getting out of bounds; short inbounds completions...
  6. Let's see what team makes the necessary adjustments at half.
  7. The DBs are just bad.
  8. Interesting opening ESPN Leonardi Bracketology has this year's Zips as a 14 seed in the East region, playing Michigan in Minneapolis.
  9. So much excitement rolling into Homecoming week.
  10. So, you mean when his contract expires.
  11. They've given up 339 yards of rushing thus far. Yikes.
  12. Wellllll.....it is the most compelling competition on that field today.
  13. The NCAA issued a statement that the Ohio Court of Appeals has issued a decision that the preliminary injunction allowing players like Evan to play was an abuse of discretion by the trial court and undid the injunction. There should still be an avenue available to the Ohio Supreme Court but I suspect that would take more time than they have.
  14. This is a real measuring stick game for the Zips as it is the first game this season against a similarly situated MAC opponent. The Zips should be at a point where these games are at a minimum competitive.
  15. UA would never pay for 12 assistants!
  16. I only post the prime unsubstantiated and unverified rumors.
  17. I've heard (and it is no stronger than that) that Broughton could have played against UNLV if absolutely necessary but that they didn't want to risk it and wanted him back to health by the start of the MAC schedule and that he should be ready for this week.
  18. What Could The 2026 MAC Football Budgets Look Like? - HERO Sports https://share.google/oDej3CFy0Tdub6ZJq 13th of 13.
  19. The greatest deficiency in Joe's program is a lack of financial support. The university is in no position to provide it and he doesn't have the ability to rally the financial support the program needs.
  20. Wide receivers running wide open 15 yards behind DBs isn't a talent issue. If the receivers were outrunning or out jumping the DBs we could say it was a talent issue but that scenario is a breakdown in the coverage by a player or players having a mental lapse.
  21. They were up 7-0 and then got outscored 38-3. In the end, they were beaten by a more talented team but they blew their chance to be in the game with turnovers and mental errors on defense. Receivers getting that open aren't getting that open because a talent deficiencies of the DBs. They're getting that open because of inexcusable mental errors in coverage.
  22. Three decent drives that resulted in no points combined with two UNLV TDs where the Zips didn't have a DB in the same zip code.
  23. I think that was Walter Winchell's first job.
  24. When there's no independent press at the presser and the person asking the questions is obviously a UA employee it's really no difference than a casual friendly PR type interview.
  25. Sounds like some news as the the Ohio Supreme Court denied the motion to stay and restore the preliminary injunction that allowed the players, including Evan, to play. https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2026/2026-Ohio-3723.pdf The first district could still grant relief but the original preliminary injunction that allowed them to play then remains on hold.
×
×
  • Create New...