LZIp Posted Monday at 10:04 PM Report Posted Monday at 10:04 PM How does anyone keep up with this crap 2 Quote
zippy5 Posted Monday at 10:05 PM Report Posted Monday at 10:05 PM Just now, LZIp said: How does anyone keep up with this crap Seriously. I have no idea what is even being litigated anymore to know which stay or injunction even means at this point 1 Quote
NWAkron Posted Monday at 10:48 PM Report Posted Monday at 10:48 PM 38 minutes ago, LZIp said: How does anyone keep up with this crap the Wisne case is nationwide injuction for a certain class of athletes. Because it is federal it takes precedent over the ohio judges' decisions. however, the Wisne case is limited to a select class of athletes: Who it covers: Division I athletes who began competing in 2022–23 and finished four seasons by 2025–26. What it does: Prevents the NCAA from denying this specific group a fifth year of eligibility under new transition/age rules. Key limitations: It does not override general transfer portal windows, age caps over 24, professional contract restrictions, or roster/revenue limits. Evan isn't transferring. Amani and Tavari weren't in the portal (right?) so they may be out of luck. Quote
kreed5120 Posted Monday at 11:24 PM Report Posted Monday at 11:24 PM All I know is the real winners with all this litigation is attorneys and their billable hours. 1 1 Quote
Zips1991 Posted yesterday at 01:22 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:22 AM 2 hours ago, NWAkron said: the Wisne case is nationwide injuction for a certain class of athletes. Because it is federal it takes precedent over the ohio judges' decisions. however, the Wisne case is limited to a select class of athletes: Who it covers: Division I athletes who began competing in 2022–23 and finished four seasons by 2025–26. What it does: Prevents the NCAA from denying this specific group a fifth year of eligibility under new transition/age rules. Key limitations: It does not override general transfer portal windows, age caps over 24, professional contract restrictions, or roster/revenue limits. Evan isn't transferring. Amani and Tavari weren't in the portal (right?) so they may be out of luck. But could Amani, in theory, return to Akron since he never entered the portal? Quote
zippy5 Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM 35 minutes ago, Zips1991 said: But could Amani, in theory, return to Akron since he never entered the portal? I think the answer at the moment is no, because he signed a professional contract. But things change every day. Who knows Quote
kreed5120 Posted yesterday at 01:21 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:21 PM 11 hours ago, zippy5 said: I think the answer at the moment is no, because he signed a professional contract. But things change every day. Who knows Louisville signed a G League player named London Johnson so I'm not going to pretend to know the rules these days. We're at our roster limit though so we can't sign anymore players anyways. Quote
Hilltopper Posted yesterday at 01:22 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:22 PM 13 hours ago, kreed5120 said: All I know is the real winners with all this litigation is attorneys and their billable hours. Hey, you know they all have big house payments! Lol Quote
kreed5120 Posted yesterday at 01:26 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:26 PM 1 minute ago, Hilltopper said: Hey, you know they all have big house payments! Lol Maybe Akron can expand it's law school to add some specialities in NCAA and NIL litigation. It seems to be a growing segment /s Quote
zippy5 Posted yesterday at 02:46 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:46 PM 1 hour ago, kreed5120 said: Louisville signed a G League player named London Johnson so I'm not going to pretend to know the rules these days. We're at our roster limit though so we can't sign anymore players anyways. Apparently he was a special case because he enrolled in a professional development program before ever going to college. This stuff is so dumb lol Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted yesterday at 03:11 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 03:11 PM 22 minutes ago, zippy5 said: Apparently he was a special case because he is going to Louisville (not a mid major). This stuff is so dumb lol FIFY 1 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago Apparently a similar blanket ruling has occurred in NY. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.