Jump to content

Game 11- Princeton


clarkwgriswold

Recommended Posts

I thought Okonkwo was good against better competition today but he needs to cut down on the silly fouls.

 

The team as a whole fell apart a little late, relying too much on one on one offense and the pick and roll rather than running what worked in the first half.  

 

At 7-5, I wonder what the schedule critics think at this juncture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, clarkwgriswold said:

Still wondering how it takes 7 minutes to determine something is conclusive.

What about the other 15 points they subtracted from the deficit in the final 15 minutes?

 

It wasn't a millimeter here-or-there that cost us the game. They hit clutch shots, while we clanged-away from 3.

 

Who is "clutch" on this Zips team, and who short-arms their shots when we need a bucket?

 

Nate and Tavari are the guys I want to have the ball down the stretch. Grey, Hardman, Wilson, etc....not so much.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Captain Kangaroo said:

What about the other 15 points they subtracted from the deficit in the final 15 minutes?

 

It wasn't a millimeter here-or-there that cost us the game. They hit clutch shots, while we clanged-away from 3.

 

Who is "clutch" on this Zips team, and who short-arms their shots when we need a bucket?

 

Nate and Tavari are the guys I want to have the ball down the stretch. Grey, Hardman, Wilson, etc....not so much.

 

Yep, I don't see a "go to" guy on this squad.  They've always had that guy before but I don't see it, at least yet.

 

My head is going to explode the next time Hardman is not between the guy he is guarding and the basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, clarkwgriswold said:

I thought Okonkwo was good against better competition today but he needs to cut down on the silly fouls.

 

The team as a whole fell apart a little late, relying too much on one on one offense and the pick and roll rather than running what worked in the first half.  

 

At 7-5, I wonder what the schedule critics think at this juncture.

 

I think the record is more reflective of the talent this team has than it does strength of schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Zippy87 said:

 

I think the record is more reflective of the talent this team has than it does strength of schedule.

 

I think the record is more reflective of 'how' they have played, not 'who' they have played. Ark St., Princeton, had late leads and should have won them both.

 

Perhaps a few more of those type of games make for a better team, but worse non-con record. Zips can go 13-5 in the MAC and I'm not sure they would be any better in March than they are now. That's how bad the MAC is.

 

Zips could also go .500 in the MAC, based on what we see right now, and wouldn't be totally surprised. Disappointed, but not surprised. Non-con schedule showed they can beat bad teams, play with some good teams ... but not sure about winning against good teams.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...