Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Purdue/Alabama was a good game.  Purdue is really solid.  Two very good bigs and a strong 7'4" backup, though Trey Kaufman-Reay who was playing his first game left the game hurt with a couple of minutes left.  The guards are also very good.  I can see the Zips competing on the perimeter but the inside is going to be very tough.  The Boilermakers killed a very athletic and solid Bama squad on the boards.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Looking at the box score, Purdue outrebounded Bama 52-28. Bama shot decently well but Purdue shot exceptionally well.

 

Purdue: 47% FG, 42.9% 3P

 

Bama: 42.4% FG, 36.4% 3P

 

Bama only lost by 7. Our style is very similar to Bama's. This gives me hope that we can be competitive with Purdue despite being completely outmatched in the post. 

Edited by Let'sGoZips94
  • Like 2
  • Captain Kangaroo changed the title to Game 4- at Purdue - Sunday Nov. 16th @ 7:30 pm (FOX Sports)
Posted
1 hour ago, csims0917 said:

Purdue is 19.5 favorites. I hope we can cover at least but that’s a friendly line for us I feel


That was basically the Ohio vs. Louisville game. I’m hoping for a better result, but Vegas is pretty good at what they do. 

Posted
On 11/13/2025 at 7:24 AM, MDZip said:

The Zips are certainly testing themselves with a challenging OOC scheduled to start the season, but there's challenging and suicidal. Oakland also started with Purdue (when they were #1) and Michigan (#6) and Houston (new #1). 

They are trying to game the SOS/RPI System......

Posted
1 hour ago, kreed5120 said:

RPI is obsolete. Oakland is just trying to collect paychecks.

 Not RPI, but I distinctly remember Kent being ranked higher better than Miami last year in NET (which seemed to play a part in NIT invite). Playing Alabama and another big program seemed to play a part in that.

Posted
10 minutes ago, LZIp said:

 Not RPI, but I distinctly remember Kent being ranked higher better than Miami last year in NET (which seemed to play a part in NIT invite). Playing Alabama and another big program seemed to play a part in that.

Sometimes, the metrics overwhelm common sense.  Being 0-3 head to head to Miami should have been the primary factor.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, LZIp said:

 Not RPI, but I distinctly remember Kent being ranked higher better than Miami last year in NET (which seemed to play a part in NIT invite). Playing Alabama and another big program seemed to play a part in that.

 

NET factors in who you play and margin of victory. There is more to the formula as well, but it's not all publicly known. If you play a UNC or Purdue, but lose by 40 it doesn't help you as you performed as or worse than expected. If you play a Purdue or UNC and lose by 5 then it benefits you as you performed better than expected. 

 

If you play NIU and win by 40 it can help you. If you play NIU and only win by 5 it will hurt you. 

 

It's not a simple SOS formula like RPI was. RPI was a much easier system to game.

Edited by kreed5120

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...