All Activity
- Past hour
-
I want that too! However lets get 3 teams in(JMU, AAC Champ, UNLV). I know that it will not happen, but plausible
-
72-47 at the end of three.
-
I feel it may be time to move the MAC title game back to the top seed's home field.
-
I think there's a very very real chance of this. Chaos reigns supreme!
-
If Duke wins it gets really interesting because the playoffs guarantee to the 5 highest rated conference champions, and JMU and either Tulane/North Texas would likely be rated higher than Duke. But I think you're right if JMU loses, UNLV could sneak in there.
- Today
-
Thanks Chat GPT.
-
This is a 2026 thing but... If we get Duke, Troy, and UNLV Conference champions, UNLV at 11-2 (having avenged one of the 2) is a very possible playoff team Which means Akron could possibly host a playoff team next year.
-
Is it anywhere other than instagram?
-
The video packages in general are light years better this year than previous years. It looks like a professional production now.
-
This This This. We should all be excited
-
Time for a 4-team MAC playoff š
-
The 2025 MAC Football Championship Game will feature Western Michigan vs Miami (OH) on December 6, 2025 at Ford Field in Detroit, Michigan. š Key Details Matchup: Western Michigan Broncos (8ā4, 7ā1 MAC) vs Miami RedHawks (7ā5, 6ā2 MAC) Date: Saturday, December 6, 2025 Location: Ford Field, Detroit, Michigan TV Coverage: ESPN Significance: Western Michigan secured its spot with a 31ā21 win over Eastern Michigan. Miami clinched by defeating Ball State 45ā24 in the regular-season finale. This is Miamiās third consecutive MAC title game appearance. Miami handed Western Michigan its only MAC loss earlier in the season (26ā17). š Season Context Western Michigan: Strong defense, opportunistic turnovers, and balanced offense under coach Lance Taylor. Miami (OH): Veteran leadership from coach Chuck Martin, resilient late-game performances, and a knack for closing out tight contests. Other Contenders: Toledo, Ohio, and Central Michigan were in the mix but fell short in the final week.
-
Bucknell seem like theyāll be pretty solid at their level but not good enough to play above. Good chance to improve on the defensive end
-
22-9 end of 1Q. Weāre going to get run out of our own gym by the coach ole Chucky ran out of town arenāt we.
-
She doesn't strike me as that kind of person.
-
She should run up the score on them. She clearly is the better coach.
-
I'm sensing an ugly day ahead for the women's team. I spoke briefly with Melissa at the men's YSU scrimmage and she seemed very happy.
-
I'm impressed that they're using correct pronouns.
-
Bucknell has certainly not followed the Miami scheduling plan as they have had decent opponents. They look to have two skilled bigs which gives the Zips another chance to continue to work in Barre.
-
I mean overall wins as a tie breaker. If three teams finish 7-1 in the MAC and two had 3ooc wins and the third only 2 ooc wins, the two ten win teams go.
-
Here is how ChatGPT breaks this down. I compiled this on my phone while riding passenger on my way to Columbus. I attempted to manually format to make it a little bit cleaner and easier to read. Offense gap is large. Akronās AdjO (~120.5) is elite for a mid-major and sits in the top ~25ā60 nationally depending on week; Bucknellās AdjO (~101.5) sits near the bottom third. That ~19 points per 100 possessions gap is the primary story. Tempo matters. Akron plays a noticeably faster pace (~72.4 possessions/game), which tends to amplify offensive advantage (more possessions = more opportunity). Bucknell is slower (~68.1) so they naturally reduce possessions ā a classic underdog slowing strategy ā but Akronās offense is efficient enough that tempo moderation probably wonāt fully erase the gap. Defense ā middling vs below average. Akronās AdjD (~106) is average-to-slightly-better-than-average; Bucknellās AdjD (~111) is weaker. So Bucknell needs to get stops AND hope to limit Akronās chances; thatās a tall order. Efficiency drivers (from box/advanced splits): KenPomās line for Akron shows a high eFG% and top-50 tempo; Bucknellās lower AdjO and worse eFG / turnover numbers (KenPom rank indicators) indicate Bucknell struggles to create clean shots and/or avoid turnovers and defensive breakdowns. Team strengths & weaknesses (practical) Akron (strengths) High-volume, efficient scoring ā they rank well in AdjO and push possessions. That puts scoreboard pressure on opponents. They have players capable of hunting points efficiently. Transition / pace advantage ā they do damage in open court and on early offense. Akron (weaknesses / things Bucknell could exploit) Not elite defensively. Teams that limit their three-point looks or force half-court possessions could narrow margins. Bucknell (strengths) Tendency to slow tempo and clamp in half-court sets. They try to limit possessions, protect the paint, and control the clock. This can make games lower scoring and increase variance. Bucknell (weaknesses) Offensive inefficiency. Low AdjO and poor shooting/creation numbers; struggles to score against better defenses. Recent heavy losses underline vulnerabilities. Defensive lapses vs quality opponents. When pressed by high-tempo teams that move the ball and attack the rim, Bucknell has had trouble. Key matchup factors & XāO chess Akronās shooters vs Bucknell closeouts. If Akron shoots well from three, Bucknellās slower pace wonāt matter ā Akron can get quick early leads and then control tempo. If Bucknell can force Akron into contested jumpers and reduce open looks, the game gets closer. Rebounding & second-chance points. Bucknell must limit Akronās offensive rebounds and keep the game to a single possession per trip. Akronās pace gives them offensive rebound opportunities. Turnover margin. Akronās efficiency suggests they donāt turn the ball over excessively; Bucknell needs to generate turnovers to create extra possessions. If Akron protects the ball, Bucknellās lower touchdown-rate offense wonāt keep up. Foul/FT game. If Bucknell tries to hack/physical game to stop Akron early (and send them to line), watch Akronās free-throw rates and make percentage. Teams that draw fouls and convert free throws can blunt a slowing strategy. Matchup projection & numbers Raw KenPom-style expectation: given Akronās AdjO ~120.5 vs Bucknell AdjD ~111.1, and Akronās AdjD ~106.3 vs Bucknell AdjO ~101.5, the net favors Akron by a sizable margin. On a neutral court, that gap commonly translates into a double-digit edge (ā10ā15 points). If Akron is home that margin increases; if Bucknell is home it shrinks but Akron still looks favored on paper.
-
The 2-6 Bucknell Bison come to Akron Wednesday night to face our 6-2 Zips. The Bison have wins over Delaware and Mount St. Mary's and losses to Princeton, Hofstra, Pittsburgh, St. John's, Bowling Green and Buffalo. 6'11" German freshman forward/center Amon Dories leads Bison scoring at 14.8 ppg while contributing 4.2 rpg. 6'9" senior forward Ruot Bijiek is second in scoring at 12.5 ppg while leading rebounding at 4.8 rpg. The Bison play Cornell today.
-
This is a hilarious Wentz Financial Group promo. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRNi583ku8Y/?igsh=MWRzaWt5YW41OHZ5dA==
