kreed5120 Posted Thursday at 05:27 PM Report Posted Thursday at 05:27 PM (edited) 9 minutes ago, ZippyDoo said: Playing around on Google today... 1,043,716 high school students play 11 player tackle football in the United States.... Division 1: 3.4 % (Roughly 1 in 30 high school players make it to a D1 program) Division 2: 1.9 % ( Roughly 1 in 53 high school players) Division 3: 2.5 % (Roughly 1 in 40 high school players This seems crazy to see that it is "easier" to make it to a D1 program than a D2 program but this is explained by by the fact that there are more D1 schools in FBS and FCS than there are in D2 programs and the D1 programs carry larger rosters. I'm not sure that's the correct way to look at it. Top 3.4% play D1 3.4%-5.3% play D2 5.3%-7.8% play D3 Anyone who played D1 likely had options to play D2 or D3. Most who played D3 didn't have options to play D1. Obviously there are exceptions. Therefore I would say D1 is naturally more challenging to get into even though it has a higher player count. Edited Thursday at 05:28 PM by kreed5120 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted Thursday at 06:18 PM Report Posted Thursday at 06:18 PM 1 hour ago, Blue & Gold said: Agreed. I was only joking. These stats are from a few years ago but are probably still pretty accurate in that only 7% of high school athletes will play college ball on any level. Less than 1% are good enough to go D1… but even at the D3 level you’re still watching the top 7% of athletes the country has to offer. D3 gets a little tricky because they don't (legally) offer athletic scholarships. There are guys attending Akron, Kent, Ohio State, etc., who aren't there to play sports, that are as or more athletic than most D3 athletes, but they couldn't afford or didn't want to pay the high tuition that comes with going the D3 route. On the flip side, a school like Hoban is a combination of many top athletes in the region (which is a VERY good HS football/athletics region) or even beyond because they can recruit. I remember when I was in an underclassmen at a greater Akron area high school, there were a couple kids in my class and the class below that were REALLY solid athletes that never made it to my high school because Hoban & St. V plucked them after middle school. Massillon would be another example of a NEO high school that could be in the argument against a D3 school, although in any scenario I think D3 ultimately wins out due to depth, age, size, etc. Quote
Blue & Gold Posted Thursday at 06:29 PM Report Posted Thursday at 06:29 PM Yes. I’m on my phone so typing is kind of a drag, but I’ll try to explain my understanding of the statistics. 7% is the total number of college players. The bottom of that 7% would be playing D3. From the 7% you whittle it down for players with D2 offers (for illustration let’s just say 5% of high schoolers.) From that 5% you whittle it down further for players with FCS offers (let’s just say 2% of high schoolers). And then from that 2% you finally whittle it down to ~>1% receiving FBS offers. You could probably even whittle that ~1% even further if you separated players out w/ P5 offers as opposed to only G6 offers, but I’ve not seen stats on that. Also, if fewer high schoolers are playing football nowadays than in years past that would also affect the percentage b/c the number of available scholarships would remain constant. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.