Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, GP1 said:

He's already having success, it just didn't show up in wins because he was killed by injuries. He has been recruiting well, endowments, win against rival and a real team, two sold out home games, win against Liberty, I thought they had a great game plan against the Zips and executed it as well as they could all things considered. 

 

If any first year Akron coach had the pre-injury success George did the first six games of the start of their career at Akron, we would all be floored at the success. Some of you can't be so obtuse that you can't see what a great hire he was. I wish Akron had the brains to think outside the box and hire someone other then Faust, Ianello, Bowden and Arth. 

3 wins in the MAC will never be an achievement worth celebrating. It's by far and away the worst conference in all of FBS. 

 

Like I said, I'm not saying he won't be great there. I'm simply stating the jury is still out, which it is. I'm not advocating for any particular coaching hire at this time.

Posted
1 minute ago, kreed5120 said:

3 wins in the MAC will never be an achievement worth celebrating. It's by far and away the worst conference in all of FBS. 

 

Like I said, I'm not saying he won't be great there. I'm simply stating the jury is still out, which it is. I'm not advocating for any particular coaching hire at this time.

Technically one win in the MAC, though I would think they beat umASS next week.

Posted
3 minutes ago, LZIp said:

Technically one win in the MAC, though I would think they beat umASS next week.

Yes, I could have worded it better. I was meaning winning 3 (or 4 with UMess win) games when you play 8 of your 12 games against MAC teams isn't anything special regardless of circumstances. Arguing otherwise is just playing mental gymnastics.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

3 wins in the MAC will never be an achievement worth celebrating. It's by far and away the worst conference in all of FBS. 

 

Like I said, I'm not saying he won't be great there. I'm simply stating the jury is still out, which it is. I'm not advocating for any particular coaching hire at this time.

Look at more than the W-L. Nobody is celebrating. I'm pointing out that without being crippled with injuries, BG is a good team that would have had a chance at Detroit, won around 8 games and gone to a bowl. If BGs season was only the first six games, it would be defined as a success. We've never had that good of a start to a season. 

 

It is common for people to mistake facts for reasons. It's why sports debate is so dumb and why turning on ESPN can only make someone dumber.  The fact is BG will have a 3 win season. The reasons are easily explainable. I don't think a three win season makes George a bad hire and stand by him being a good hire. I wish Akron would hire this boldly after fixing all of the other crap that would destroy a bold hire. I wish at the end of a three win season Akron fans could look back and easily explain it with the understanding that it was a fluke and better days were ahead, but our failures are so many they are hard to explain and fix. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, GP1 said:

 I don't think a three win season makes George a bad hire and stand by him being a good hire. I wish Akron would hire this boldly after fixing all of the other crap that would destroy a bold hire. I wish at the end of a three win season Akron fans could look back and easily explain it with the understanding that it was a fluke and better days were ahead, but our failures are so many they are hard to explain and fix. 

 

I never said George was a bad hire. I said it's still too early to tell, which I stand by.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Lee Adams said:

Well.. a win is a win. Before the season I said 4-4 in the MAC was minimum. They got that. But I also said major program changes were/are needed. Yep. The more I read posts here about the lack of support from Administration for for football the more obvious it is. If the Admin. refuses to support the program at a DI level then they have to get out of DI! The record spesks for itself. Changing coaches is like moving the bulbs on the Xmas tree. Same tree.

Either put up for DI or drop to 1AA or DII where U can afford to compete every season. Not a big Moorehead fan anymore but the problems go far deeper.

Unfortunately too many delusional on here who ignore history and think the program can compete at this level. STOP!

Posted
17 minutes ago, clarkwgriswold said:

Let's play Jeopardy.

 

The answer is "2004."

JDs first year. Charley's last season. Winning record but no Bowl invite. Lee Owens recruit's mainly. I believe they may have beaten Marshall? etc. etc.

  • Thumbs down 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...