kreed5120 Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM On 3/19/2026 at 2:29 PM, kreed5120 said: You generally don't want the 8/9 seed line if you hope to go on a run. Now TCU likely goes on to lose by 15 to Duke. I guess I was being too generous to TCU. Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Nate Oats joining in on ripping Miami OH. I love it. These coaches let Miami OH's carriage turn back into a pumpkin and now they're stomping on it. It's glorious. Quote
MDZip Posted yesterday at 12:27 PM Report Posted yesterday at 12:27 PM (edited) As of this moment there are 24 teams left in the tournament. Only two are not P4 teams (and one is from the Big East). Yay college basketball. 🤮 Edited yesterday at 12:38 PM by MDZip 1 1 Quote
exit322 Posted yesterday at 01:37 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:37 PM 1 hour ago, MDZip said: As of this moment there are 24 teams left in the tournament. Only two are not P4 teams (and one is from the Big East). Yay college basketball. 🤮 The dance is dead. At least we have the memories. Quote
Sergeant Zip Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago Don't have the stats for this year but Cinderella is dead 1 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, Sergeant Zip said: Don't have the stats for this year but Cinderella is dead Assuming "upset" is referring to simply the seeds, then this isn't stating Cinderellas are dead - this is stating the gap between the elite programs and the field is growing. Kentucky just got beat by 19 today and Iowa State's best player (arguably) didn't even play. It's not a NIL problem - it's a Transfer Portal problem. That is the #1 issue that needs resolved in college athletics. Not only does there need to be some sort of limitation on movement, but commitments need to be minimum 2 years contractually. Also, teams need compensated for losing talent, especially mid majors. 3 Quote
Illini Zip Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said: Assuming "upset" is referring to simply the seeds, then this isn't stating Cinderellas are dead - this is stating the gap between the elite programs and the field is growing. Kentucky just got beat by 19 today and Iowa State's best player (arguably) didn't even play. It's not a NIL problem - it's a Transfer Portal problem. That is the #1 issue that needs resolved in college athletics. Not only does there need to be some sort of limitation on movement, but commitments need to be minimum 2 years contractually. Also, teams need compensated for losing talent, especially mid majors. NIL should be capped, but good luck enforcing it. Quote
kreed5120 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Not really anything NCAA can do. The minute they tried to place a cap players will challenge it in court and would win. Quote
ZipForNow Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Don’t forget conference realignment. That contributes. Quote
kreed5120 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago It looks like Utah State's run is over. It might provide some more clarity to the coaches search as Calhoun was linked to Cincy job. Interesting enough I saw an interview from Calhoun who said last year Utah State had $800k in NIL. This season they increased it to $2.3M. He said he was the 2nd largest contributor as apparently he put up $150K. His phrasing was if he's asking others for money it only felt right for him to lead by example. 2 Quote
LZIp Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 hours ago, kreed5120 said: It looks like Utah State's run is over. It might provide some more clarity to the coaches search as Calhoun was linked to Cincy job. Interesting enough I saw an interview from Calhoun who said last year Utah State had $800k in NIL. This season they increased it to $2.3M. He said he was the 2nd largest contributor as apparently he put up $150K. His phrasing was if he's asking others for money it only felt right for him to lead by example. For some reason I thought coaches weren’t permitted to contribute. Then again, it’s not like rules are being enforced anymore Quote
Illini Zip Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, LZIp said: For some reason I thought coaches weren’t permitted to contribute. Then again, it’s not like rules are being enforced anymore It’s a really good question. Quote
ZipForNow Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago In this country, how to spend one’s own money has come to be seen as an inalienable right. I wonder how this would play out in court. It seems like a bad idea for coaches to be able to do this. Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago I think Akron was the only Over because of TTU's hot 3P shooting. Quote
kreed5120 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 25 minutes ago, LZIp said: For some reason I thought coaches weren’t permitted to contribute. Then again, it’s not like rules are being enforced anymore It's probably a loophole since they aren't paying any specific player directly. Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Groce is a member of the Summit Circle. It's completely legal, whether by design or not. Quote
Illini Zip Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 44 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said: I think Akron was the only Over because of TTU's hot 3P shooting. But it could have affected Tavari especially with his layups. I can’t believe this is another thing we have to think about. Good grief!! Quote
zippy5 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, Illini Zip said: But it could have affected Tavari especially with his layups. I can’t believe this is another thing we have to think about. Good grief!! both teams play with the same ball, this is nothing imo 2 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 37 minutes ago Report Posted 37 minutes ago (edited) 45 minutes ago, Illini Zip said: But it could have affected Tavari especially with his layups. I can’t believe this is another thing we have to think about. Good grief!! I questioned this early in the game thread. Tavari had one layup bounce HARD off the backboard and he seemed to shy away from using the backboard the rest of the game. His floaters and reverse layups went straight for the cylinder which requires more precision, especially with over-inflated balls. Our bounce passes seemed to catch the recipient off guard as well. 36 minutes ago, zippy5 said: both teams play with the same ball, this is nothing imo One team made their 3s - the other didn't and tried doing their damage in the paint. To completely dismiss this is silly. Edited 29 minutes ago by Let'sGoZips94 1 Quote
Illini Zip Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago I’m not saying the ball was the reason we lost, but it’s apparently an issue. And something that fundamental to the sport shouldn’t be. Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 21 minutes ago Report Posted 21 minutes ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Illini Zip said: I’m not saying the ball was the reason we lost, but it’s apparently an issue. And something that fundamental to the sport shouldn’t be. 100%. It magnifies less-than-perfect shooting IMO. TTU was pure on Friday - nothing but nylon. The NCAA is so so so so so bad. I question more and more if the NCAA governing body isn't more of a money laundering operation than anything. Edited 21 minutes ago by Let'sGoZips94 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.