2025-26 season in process

[NWAkron]

Key Voting Details:

Football: Head coaches vote on All-MAC teams and specialty awards.

Basketball (Men's & Women's): Head coaches vote on All-MAC teams and specialty awards.

Restrictions: Coaches cannot vote for their own players. 

 

I wonder if the fired coaches bothered to vote!

 

[Let'sGoZips94]

19 minutes ago, NWAkron said:

Who votes on this?  

 

Incompetent morons (minus Groce).

Edited 21 hours ago by Let'sGoZips94

[Let'sGoZips94]

 

[NWAkron]

18 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

I could understand this if the narrative-pushing media voted on this but the coaches?  Certainly, some privilege occurring here.  

Edited 21 hours ago by NWAkron

[MDZip]

19 hours ago, zippy5 said:

Suder POTY 

 

LOL

Since the coaches vote on this, the only possible reason I can think of is Akron "fatigue". 

[Illini Zip]

They might also expect Tavari to win Tournament MVP. Sharing the love so to speak.

[Let'sGoZips94]

2 hours ago, MDZip said:

Since the coaches vote on this, the only possible reason I can think of is Akron "fatigue". 

 

Or it was quietly discussed to make sure Miami OH has the best player to help their image. By the way, coaches who are canned in the days following their season's end shouldn't be allowed to vote. What in the world do they know about talent? Not enough to keep their job.

 

20 minutes ago, Illini Zip said:

They might also expect Tavari to win Tournament MVP. Sharing the love so to speak.

 

Even if Miami OH loses 1st round, I'm half expecting the tourney MVP to be Suder still. We will be so lucky just to breathe the same Rocket Arena air as him.

Edited 1 hour ago by Let'sGoZips94

[kreed5120]

3 hours ago, MDZip said:

Since the coaches vote on this, the only possible reason I can think of is Akron "fatigue". 

 

If that was the case they simply would have given it to Gillespie. Unlike Suder, there was actually an argument to be made for him winning it depending on which stats a voter would prioritize.

 

IMO voting has just turned into giving it to the best player on the 1st place team. It's a similar model that the NBA has been running for what I'm guessing to be 2 decades now.

Edited 54 minutes ago by kreed5120

[clarkwgriswold]

4 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

If that was the case they simply would have given it to Gillespie. Unlike Suder, there was actually an argument to be made for him winning it depending on which stats a voter would prioritize.

 

IMO voting has just turned into giving it to the best player on the 1st place team. It's a similar model that the NBA has been running for what I'm guessing to be 2 decades now.

 

Well, they gave it to the most ball dominant guy on the first place team.