Jump to content

The World of College Football


GP1

Recommended Posts

On 10/23/2024 at 10:25 PM, Captain Kangaroo said:

0-6 Kennesaw State beats 5-0 Liberty. 

And most College Football Fans already knew that Liberty were Frauds....

Edited by lance99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClevelandZip said:


This information turned out to be junk, so I apologize for jumping the gun. Grand Canyon University, a for-profit scam college, officially joined the Mountain West today as a non-football member. Despite being a scam college, they have a great basketball team. The word is that the Mountain West is still pursuing NIU and Toledo as football-only members. That would be a disaster for the MAC.

 

Our media deal where we have to play at the worst times and get the smallest payouts continues to be detrimental. Not sure how the commissioner still has a job after letting ESPN abuse the conference like this. Need someone who can actually negotiate. Atlantic 10 schools get a higher payout than MAC schools, and they don’t even have football, which is supposedly the money-making sport.

 

In the Toledo Blade article, one of the MAC basketball coaches was quoted as saying that basketball is the lone sport where the MAC schools can make money. I'm sure football would be able to make money if we had a better media deal, but I'm with you - MAC commish needs canned for what he has done to the conference. I don't think mid-week MACtion is all that detrimental, as many CFB fans nationwide love it, but the amount of money schools get for sacrificing traditional Saturday environments isn't worth it. In addition, he has failed to grow the conference with schools who actually give a damn about sports. 

 

Regarding the Mountain West, they're embarrassing themselves with their rebuild plan. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

In the Toledo Blade article, one of the MAC basketball coaches was quoted as saying that basketball is the lone sport where the MAC schools can make money. 

I'd love to know his evidence. It's a long way between teaching a kid how to break a fulll court press and understanding the complexities of television revenue generation. My argument against it is no network is offering more money because sponsors don't get value out of the advertisements so they won't pay more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GP1 said:

I'd love to know his evidence. It's a long way between teaching a kid how to break a fulll court press and understanding the complexities of television revenue generation. My argument against it is no network is offering more money because sponsors don't get value out of the advertisements so they won't pay more. 

 

I don't really think television money is a big factor at the MAC level to matter in this discussion. The MAC TV deal pays like $800k a year per school. A few years ago, if I recall correctly, there was a quote from Larry Williams saying we spends $10 million annually on football. I'm not even sure if that figure included the cost of Infocision financing. There is more revenue in football, but there is also a considerable amount of more overhead.

 

Most mid-major programs are spending between $1.5-$4 million on their basketball programs. You also play 12-15 home games in basketball vs only 5-6 in football.

 

Let's say you spend $3 million on basketball and play 15 home games. You would need to generate $200k revenue per home contest to hit your breakeven. If you play 6 home football games and need $9 million to breakeven (10 million-1 million for TV), you need to average $1.5 million in revenue per home game.

 

Edit: This is a simplified version. Obviously there are other factors, like NCAA tournament credits, bowl payouts, etc that can reduce the real breakeven number. The point I was more trying to illustrate is that even though football is immensely more popular, it's very costly to run. That's why you see spring football leagues constantly fail. Even when the ratings are fairly decent. If you add NIL into the mix, the gap between funding a football team vs basketball team grows even further. It's much more manageable to pay 7-8 basketball players than it will be to pay 20-30 football players.

Edited by kreed5120
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine part of the thought process for basketball being more profitable is the guaranteed money from making the NCAA tournament, and better odds of a MAC program advancing vs football. There's a reason why the MW is back-filling with some basketball-only programs that have had proven recent success in March.

 

This is also exactly why the MAC needs to be looking at the Missouri Valley for strong basketball programs with FCS football if they get off their hands and decide to grow.

Edited by Let'sGoZips94
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed that the college football playoff committee contains two former Akron AD's. 

 

Michigan athletic director Warde Manuel (committee chair)

Former Nevada coach Chris Ault

Navy athletic director Chet Gladchuk

Former Wake Forest coach Jim Grobe

Miami (Ohio) athletic director David Sayler

Former sportswriter Kelly Whiteside

Former All-American Nebraska lineman Will Shields

Former Toledo and Missouri coach Gary Pinkel

Baylor athletic director Mack Rhoades

Virginia athletic director Carla Williams

Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek

Former Oregon State and Nebraska coach Mike Riley

Former Arizona State All-American guard Randall McDaniel

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MDZip said:

Just noticed that the college football playoff committee contains two former Akron AD's. 

 

Michigan athletic director Warde Manuel (committee chair)

Former Nevada coach Chris Ault

Navy athletic director Chet Gladchuk

Former Wake Forest coach Jim Grobe

Miami (Ohio) athletic director David Sayler

Former sportswriter Kelly Whiteside

Former All-American Nebraska lineman Will Shields

Former Toledo and Missouri coach Gary Pinkel

Baylor athletic director Mack Rhoades

Virginia athletic director Carla Williams

Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek

Former Oregon State and Nebraska coach Mike Riley

Former Arizona State All-American guard Randall McDaniel

Shockingly, Dennis Helsel, Tom Wistercill and Larry Williams were not invited to join.

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

We thought the Info was a bad financial decision. 

 

Northwestern said, "Hold my wine..."

 

Northwestern has something that Akron does not: CASH and the Endowment to back it up and they finally decided to spend some of it......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, lance99 said:

Northwestern has something that Akron does not: CASH and the Endowment to back it up and they finally decided to spend some of it......

 

So they built the indoor luxury version of the Info, despite playing in the Big Ten... 

 

It's 5k seats more than the Info, and 10k seats less than Boston College's stadium. Gonna have a hard time convincing me it's $850M well spent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

So they built the indoor luxury version of the Info, despite playing in the Big Ten... 

 

It's 5k seats more than the Info, and 10k seats less than Boston College's stadium. Gonna have a hard time convincing me it's $850M well spent. 

They got a donation, so they don't really need to convince anyone 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, zippy5 said:

They got a donation, so they don't really need to convince anyone 

Yes, not to mention the Big 10 pays out $60M+ to each school alone. A number that will only continue to increase. Also, ticket prices will be considerably higher compared to Akron.

 

The main difference between the schools is Northwestern is flush with cash to spend. Akron can't even afford training tables for its program...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

We thought the Info was a bad financial decision. 

 

Northwestern said, "Hold my wine..."

 

Well, they will have the excitement of sell out crowds, Big Ten TV money, a club level and luxury suites. Northwestern doesn't need a giant stadium. They need a stadium that will benefit the athletes students alumni fans and general community around Chicago. Looks like they got it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...