GP1 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Hilltopper said: BTW, if you could share with me where I can get a guaranteed 10% return on my $2 million please send me a DM. S&P 500 the past few years. Get you money out of the coffee can in the pantry grandpa. 2024, 23 percent 2023, 24 percent 2022, 18 percent 2021, 28 percent 2020, 18 percent Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, Captain Kangaroo said: More than the Zips. Kent Coaches and Support staff 22 coaches. including 4 grad assistants 12 support staff Akron Coaches and Support Staff 12 coaches, zero grad assistants 6 support staff Beyond that, Kent practiced 25% more than Akron was allowed, and most of that is on Arth. And...I'm note re-re-re-typing all the other stuff. Kent beat Akron in OT because they have a really good QB. They probably even have some NIL money to keep him. And they presumably had the 38 staff personnel when they were going 1-23 correct? The only thing that changed was HC? DeShields isn't a really good QB. He has a 46.4 QBR this year (104th in the country). He has only had 3 200+ passing yard games this season, with Akron being his only 300+ passing yard game. Akron needs to get to Kent-level staffing, I agree. Them having a GM is interesting as well. However, the X's & O's, the motivation capabilities, and the execution on the field matter more than anything. That's my gripe with JoeMo. Edited 1 hour ago by Let'sGoZips94 Quote
clarkwgriswold Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago It's coming back to me why I am happy at the end of a Zips football season and sad at the end of a Zips basketball season. Quote
exit322 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said: Akron needs to get to Kent-level staffing, I agree. Them having a GM is interesting as well. However, the X's & O's, the motivation capabilities, and the execution on the field matter more than anything. That's my gripe with JoeMo. That's pretty much it. Yeah, Akron's a tough job. No one's pretending it's easy. Joe isn't the type of coach that has any chance of thriving at this sort of tough job. Carney...just might be the type who can thrive at a Kent-type job. As an aside, how about a Chris Creighton at EMU (EMU being the actual type of job that many here think Akron is), who is 61-82 at a school whose last three coaches (and related interims) were 39-125. While his record isn't exactly stellar, if a guy can get EMU to five bowl games in 12 years...under current rules, between 1987 (their actual last bowl) and when Creighton arrived in 2014, they'd have had 3 or 4 bowl appearances (they had four years with an eligible record, but two FCS wins in 2011 would disqualify them without a waiver). If Eastern Michigan can go bowling about half the time...Akron should be able to reach that goal. But it will take work and the correct next hire when Joe leaves. That, traditionally, will be the tough part of this equation. Quote
LZIp Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Hilltopper said: We have donors who have contributed that much to Akron Athletics to create endowments. Just not for football. BTW, if you could share with me where I can get a guaranteed 10% return on my $2 million please send me a DM. Look at the historical average of the S&P 500. Quote
zippy5 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago That's not how endowments typically are distributed. Usually 4-5% of the balance can be distributed annually Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.