Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, kreed5120 said:

 

They were also projected to finish 7th in the MAC preseason rankings so it's not like they were all that hyped in the first place. When it's all said and done I expect them to have a top 4-5 seed.

I think they'll settle into the 5-6 seed but then get eliminated on the first day in Cleveland. So, a pretty normal season for them. I do think they're better than recent years but the league is a little deeper this year so the result may end up looking the same as usual.

Posted
14 hours ago, kreed5120 said:

 

They were also projected to finish 7th in the MAC preseason rankings so it's not like they were all that hyped in the first place. When it's all said and done I expect them to have a top 4-5 seed.

I agree with this ... in a tournament setting BG's athleticism will negate dead-leg shooting as the games wear on. They will be a better team the second and third night than they will be the first. If they get out of the first round.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

If Miami has an undefeated regular season, do they get an at large bid? 

 

There really isn't a test case to say definitively how the committee would handle the situation. Based off their computer numbers and lack of Q1 and Q2 wins it would be a no. At the same time I think it would be hard for them to exclude a team with 1 loss, presuming to a top ~50 Akron.

Posted
7 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

There really isn't a test case to say definitively how the committee would handle the situation. Based off their computer numbers and lack of Q1 and Q2 wins it would be a no. At the same time I think it would be hard for them to exclude a team with 1 loss, presuming to a top ~50 Akron.

Miami is ranked 29th or 30th now - if they won out for almost two more months you're talking top 15. Ain't no way they get left out in that scenario

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, zippy5 said:

Miami is ranked 29th or 30th now - if they won out for almost two more months you're talking top 15. Ain't no way they get left out in that scenario

 

I was referring to NET and other advanced stats the committee uses, not the AP poll. A number of years ago a ranked team, I think it was St. Mary's, was left out of March Madness despite being ranked in the polls. Being ranked isn't a guarantee to making the field.

Edited by kreed5120
Posted
32 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

I was referring to NET and other advanced stats the committee uses, not the AP poll. A number of years ago a ranked team, I think it was St. Mary's, was left out of March Madness despite being ranked in the polls. Being ranked isn't a guarantee to making the field.

I understand. I am also saying the committee isn't going to leave out a team ranked in the top 15 of the major polls

  • Like 1
Posted

I find it funny we have seen 2 games in a row with one guy just going off in the points column with Wol and Zeigler. Akron never really has that, yeah tavari can score 25 points any night, but I would love to see a game where we just get Zack Halligan 20 points and the defense had no idea coming in 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Reslife4Life said:

Looks like ball state has some new confidence after playing us close on Tuesday. Ziegler with 20 points at halftime, cardinals up 44-31 over OU

this will come down to the wire.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...