Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Finally! I think we've been patient long enough already. Seems like a real nice guy, but you have to win football games. His entire tenure looked way too much like Hugh Jackson with the Browns.

Edited by blueandgold
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, clarkwgriswold said:

I don't have a problem with axing him but I don't quite get the timing.

 

My best guess is that they waited until Akron wasn't bowl eligible anymore.

  • Haha 1
Posted

So after 35 years of losing at the FBS level we think a coach can come in here and win.  The most wins ever was ONE season with 8 wins.  One bowl win in 35 years. Most of those 35 years which I watched were losing seasons.  Outside of Christ himself not sure who can be a miracle worker.   Let us prayer for that miracle worker!! GO ZIPS

Posted (edited)

Never cared for all of the 'you knows' and coach-speak/cliches (answer the damn question). Gave me a sense that he was not fully in command and in over his head. Fine for a smaller school/lower level of play but O-fers and 1-fers are just not acceptable, especially when you look pretty bad doing it.

 

Not happy from a financial perspective assuming we don't really have a good way to fund a buy-out (big doner?) but feeling a sense of relief. Best of luck to Tom.

Edited by GoZips88
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I wanted Arth to work out at Akron. It would have been a very cool story and he really is a good guy. I'm glad I got to meet him. But after watching a few spring practices in 2019, I predicted 0-12 and it looked far worse than I was even expecting. It never looked right and this is the right move. Guthrie's career hangs on this hire.

  • Like 1
Posted

The timing is odd, and it only can be that Guthrie was waiting to see if bowl eligibility could be salvaged.  That was cruelly taken away with that ending vs. Testicle Tech (not that we're beating WMU, Toledo, or Kent, probably).  

 

That being said, I wish Coach Arth best of luck.  The results between he and the Ianello regime are similar, but the difference is that Tom is a likable guy that you want to see succeed.  And I hope he does.  

 

I have looked into absolutely zero candidates at this point, but can we PLEASE get someone with a longer track record of success at a lower level?  No high school coaches, please. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, zipsrule said:

The article indicates Arth is owed 75% of the two remaining years on his contract ($425,000 per year), which amounts to $637,500.

 

Needless to say this isn't the worst thing Arth has been through lol. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Thank You Jesus! 

7654845.gif

And Most of you Arth defenders should go with him. He's gonna need that iron curtain defense where ever he lands to steal more money. 

Edited by dre22era
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...