Jump to content

2025 NCAA Tournament


Recommended Posts

It’s as plain as the nose on your face…Power Conferences take the best and brightest mid-major players…and give us their unwanted table scraps in return. 
 

We get the best and brightest of the D2 crop, but that doesn’t nearly offset the NIL/Portal talent loss.

 

If this system were in place 25 years ago, the MAC would never have seen the likes of Bonzi Wells, Brandon Hunter, Gary Trent, Chris Kaman, Earl Boykins, Wally Szerbiak, Antonio Brown and on and on.


The Zips have some good fortune in having a great coach and someone to pay a few player’s NIL funds. But that can end tomorrow, and we’ll be fielding teams that have zero chance of ever being more than Round 1 NCAA tournament fodder. 


I hate it.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, zippy5 said:

I think we're overreacting a bit here

 

We live in the generation of hot takes. Get out of here with this rationale.

 

I do agree that NIL will lesson mid-majors chances moving forward. Not just because of them taking the best players, but also because it keeps players like Mark Sears in college longer. I still think you will see mid-majors sneak into the Sweet 16, but just not as frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

 

We live in the generation of hot takes. Get out of here with this rationale.

 

I do agree that NIL will lesson mid-majors chances moving forward. Not just because of them taking the best players, but also because it keeps players like Mark Sears in college longer. I still think you will see mid-majors sneak into the Sweet 16, but just not as frequently.

 

But the ones that do get there  are likely to be the "Major" mid-majors like Gonzaga and Creighton rather than true Cinderellas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, tpsjugglerdude said:

Watch this trend closely! Not the first, won't be the last.

Edited by ZipsBBjunkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ZipsBBjunkie said:

Watch this trend closely! Not the first, won't be the last.

fortunately, we don't have to worry about that for another year.

but we can worry about:  attendance, home and homes with Villanova, John's next endeavor, keeping up with John and Dustin, facilities, red pandas, and lack of a viable and serviceable big.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tpsjugglerdude said:

So what you're saying is Kent State lost to a soon to be D3 school this past football season 🤣 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, clarkwgriswold said:

 

probably just a matter of time before one of the lesser conference champs declines their spot in the NCAAT to participate in one of the mid-major tourneys. KSU is arguably having more fun in the postseason than what we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Captain Kangaroo said:

It’s as plain as the nose on your face…Power Conferences take the best and brightest mid-major players…and give us their unwanted table scraps in return. 
 

We get the best and brightest of the D2 crop, but that doesn’t nearly offset the NIL/Portal talent loss.

 

If this system were in place 25 years ago, the MAC would never have seen the likes of Bonzi Wells, Brandon Hunter, Gary Trent, Chris Kaman, Earl Boykins, Wally Szerbiak, Antonio Brown and on and on.


The Zips have some good fortune in having a great coach and someone to pay a few player’s NIL funds. But that can end tomorrow, and we’ll be fielding teams that have zero chance of ever being more than Round 1 NCAA tournament fodder. 


I hate it.

In addition, soon we will be at a point where the best of the best of the best end up annually at 5-6 schools. Those schools will win the championship every year. Same in football. There is nothing interesting about it. I can't even dislike a lot of teams I used to because I don't care enough to dislike them. 

 

I find myself increasingly uninterested in college athletics and it's more than the NIL. I enjoy going to Wake Forest games, even though that's getting increasingly difficult, and watching the Zips from afar. Other than that, I really don't care much for it and I used to love college athletics. Maybe it's because it's now minor league sports and I don't like minor league sports. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ZippyRulz said:

 

probably just a matter of time before one of the lesser conference champs declines their spot in the NCAAT to participate in one of the mid-major tourneys. KSU is arguably having more fun in the postseason than what we did.

You're not allowed to. Marquette declined an at-large bid to the 1970 tournament to play in the NIT instead, which the won. In 1971 the NCAA instituted a rule that if you're selected to the tournament, you must participate or have no postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GP1 said:

In addition, soon we will be at a point where the best of the best of the best end up annually at 5-6 schools. Those schools will win the championship every year. Same in football. There is nothing interesting about it. I can't even dislike a lot of teams I used to because I don't care enough to dislike them. 

 

I find myself increasingly uninterested in college athletics and it's more than the NIL. I enjoy going to Wake Forest games, even though that's getting increasingly difficult, and watching the Zips from afar. Other than that, I really don't care much for it and I used to love college athletics. Maybe it's because it's now minor league sports and I don't like minor league sports. 

I pay virtually no attention to any other games other than the Zips. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

You're not allowed to. Marquette declined an at-large bid to the 1970 tournament to play in the NIT instead, which the won. In 1971 the NCAA instituted a rule that if you're selected to the tournament, you must participate or have no postseason.

 

I would love to see that lawsuit play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to emphasize it further, here are the starting lineups of all Sweet 16 teams by the players original schools. A ton of mid major players (I count 27 out of 80). Look at Alabama on bottom four from the left. Some of these I can't even tell who the school is. 

Screenshot_20250325-211748.png

Edited by MDZip
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...