Let'sGoZips94 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, csims0917 said: Troy lost to JMU by 9 at Home. The Sun Belt is a disaster The last couple years, the MAC was a detriment to the Sun Belt. This year, the Sun Belt is a detriment to the MAC. The only way the MAC/Sun Belt Challenge holds water is if it mutually benefits the conferences. Otherwise, I think both conferences would be better off keeping it to 1 game a year and reaching out to other conferences to create a Bracket Buster style event for the 2nd half of the season. Quote
UAZipster0305 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago (edited) On 12/10/2025 at 12:47 PM, tpsjugglerdude said: People still watch the NBA? It's unwatchable. By far the worst product in all of sports entertainment. I've not seen much of it in over ten years. When I come across a game while flipping channels, I wish I had spent the few minutes spacing out to commercials or watching a tidbit of a movie I've already seen 500x. Edited 8 hours ago by UAZipster0305 1 Quote
kreed5120 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Let'sGoZips94 said: The last couple years, the MAC was a detriment to the Sun Belt. This year, the Sun Belt is a detriment to the MAC. The only way the MAC/Sun Belt Challenge holds water is if it mutually benefits the conferences. Otherwise, I think both conferences would be better off keeping it to 1 game a year and reaching out to other conferences to create a Bracket Buster style event for the 2nd half of the season. The challenge is there are only a few mid-majors each year that provide Q1 win opportunities. Add in that the A10 and MVC already have a head-to-head competition then that doesn't leave many options. The idea isn't bad. I just don't know if it would lead to any better results. Edit: I believe the WCC and MWC also have a deal, which would further reduce the options. Edited 7 hours ago by kreed5120 Quote
MDZip Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 13 teams in the MAC now, and only 4 are above .500. I wouldn't have thought that was mathematically possible. 🤣 1 Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, kreed5120 said: The challenge is there are only a few mid-majors each year that provide Q1 win opportunities. Add in that the A10 and MVC already have a head-to-head competition then that doesn't leave many options. The idea isn't bad. I just don't know if it would lead to any better results. Edit: I believe the WCC and MWC also have a deal, which would further reduce the options. Why do those leagues having deals reduce the options for a separate, singular game in February? Plus the WCC and MWC are getting plucked after this year. Every mid major needs quality opponents. Somebody needs to make it happen. Quote
kreed5120 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Let'sGoZips94 said: Why do those leagues having deals reduce the options for a separate, singular game in February? Plus the WCC and MWC are getting plucked after this year. Every mid major needs quality opponents. Somebody needs to make it happen. I was just saying those leagues already have things in place so they maybe less inclined and if you exclude those 4 mid-major conferences there are very few mid-majors left that are top ~75. Quote
Illini Zip Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said: Why do those leagues having deals reduce the options for a separate, singular game in February? Plus the WCC and MWC are getting plucked after this year. Every mid major needs quality opponents. Somebody needs to make it happen. What do you mean by plucked? Quote
Let'sGoZips94 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Illini Zip said: What do you mean by plucked? PAC12 is taking a bunch of them for their attempted revival. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.