Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. You're calling my take a bad take but you don't want to be realistic about the limitations of this year's team. If they truly had the talent to beat a top team, they would've done it at least once, and not lost to all but one of them by double-digits. We can love our team and be proud of them while staying realistic.
  3. Oh you're not wrong. This is as good as it gets. Just gotta hope they play hard for all 40 minutes so it's a 5-8 point loss and not a 20 point one.
  4. Will never break the ceiling, face it. MAC champs is all we can get. Not bad, but not great as MAC is lower mid major conference
  5. Bad 6-7 minutes in the game??? That’s close to 20%!!! Not what I expected from a Sr laden team with 2 previous tournament experience. its always about guard play in march madness and our star guy didn’t show up!!
  6. Poor perimeter defense doesn't = automatic shot making. I watched SMU the other night miss some wide open 3s, and they're a VERY good 3P shooting team. Your take was based on a lack of talent, and that's why I said it was a bad take. Akron didn't beat the top teams on their schedule - that's accurate and will need remedied in the future. However, this team had the talent to do so. The ball didn't always bounce our way. So be it, we move on. Go Zips.
  7. This team won the most games in program history. People always bring up that 2013 dambrot team as one of the best. 2020 was also up there. But this team won 29 games. If the only thing that matters is winning in the round of 64 has the program ever been good at the d1 level? The football team could go 6-6 and lose in a bowl game and people would say it’s a great season. This zips basketball team represented this school well and was something to be proud of
  8. I'm not overrating the MAC - I'm literally going on metrics. They are in the top half of conferences for the first time this decade. Not sure what point you're trying to make - MVC is rated higher than the MAC anyways.
  9. Akron lost to a very good team that plays in what can be argued as the most difficult league in the country. Akron had a bad 6-7 minutes, not a bad game.
  10. Not happening unless the Zips get substantially better. This was a banged up Texas Tech team that was probably overseeded anyways.
  11. Not a bad take at all, a realistic one. The MAC had two very good teams - us and Miami - and we both beat up on inferior competition. Those other teams you mentioned had excellent shooting performances because we play poor perimeter defense, not because of bad luck. I'm not trying to rip on our guys - I love them all and am proud of this year. But this team didn't beat a single top team the entire season. It is what it is.
  12. There will be 63 teams that say this when all is said and done.
  13. Or maybe we're overrating the MAC. Kent got smoked by a 21-12 MVC team, so it seems maybe our 5-loss team is at the same level of a 12-loss MVC team.
  14. We were only down 6 and then we scored 8 points in the final 9 minutes. Was TT that much better than us or did we just have another bad game? Really difficult to be competitive when your best player only scores 4 points and has 4 turnovers. I thought TT had a good game plan of collapsing the defense in the middle and forcing us to shoot from three. We could not make a 3 the second half. Game over. Very proud of our seniors. The Zips had a great season. But we will have to wait for next year to get that elusive tourney win.
  15. Welp, there’s always next year…
  16. If you remove your Zippy colored glasses this is an accurate take. 0 wins over top 125 teams. We were a very good, but not a great team. Our style of play allowed us to run up the score up on inferior competition, but we had too many holes defensively to take the next step. Namely we needed better perimeter defense. Edit: As @Captain Kangaroo pointed out this was probably a game Nate Johnson could have made a difference.
  17. Really bad take. They dominated the best the MAC has been in a long time, minus Miami OH which they only got 1 crack at on the road and lost by 3. Did they do enough to beat top-level competition? Nope, but it wasn't due to a lack of talent. Troy, Murray State, and Yale each had historic shooting performances. They blew out Princeton, dominated James Madison, and blew out Kent twice. They were within 2 possessions late in the game vs. a team that was in the Elite 8 last year. Again, didn't do enough, but it wasn't a talent issue. Regroup, rebuild, reach that next level. Let's Go Zips!
  18. The only teams we blew out were inferior MAC teams. Lost by 10 to Troy, lost by 15 to Murray State, lost by 18 to Purdue. Again, we were a really good MAC team. I'm proud of what they accomplished this year. But this team just wasn't talented enough to beat top-level competition.
  19. I don't think Akron was embarrassed today. Does the score look bad? Yes, but with the exception of 6-7 minutes late, they held their own.
  20. And seeing if Groce stays or leaves.
  21. Crumbled under pressure to a power school once again.
  22. I don't know if Groce is it... KIDDING KIDDING KIDDING. Future is bright. 4Peat and break the ceiling next year.
  23. And our attention turns to portal-watching...
  24. Thanks. Yes, I thought Watts fouling out was the break that we needed, but we didn't take advantage of it. Good luck in moving on.
  25. Just can’t let a team shoot 64% from the field. Not athletic or physical enough. That said, I’ll never forget last Saturday night. Great season and team.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...