Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Reslife4Life said:

Geez thats a big one. CMU could have actually been competitive next year if half their team didn't transfer

 

*Their entire team. 

 

All of their top production is in the Portal. 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Zippy87 said:

 

 

Yes please. Here's his highlight real. NAIA and stats aren't the full story. This dude is a FORCE. 6'8", very physical, and an in-game dunk contest winner. Groce & co. will coach up all the fundamentals. Get this guy in the Akron Blue & Gold.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Let'sGoZips94
  • Like 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

Yes please. Here's his highlight real. NAIA and stats aren't the full story. This dude is a FORCE. 6'8", very physical, and an in-game dunk contest winner. Groce & co. will coach up all the fundamentals. Get this guy in the Akron Blue & Gold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd much rather take a shot on a player like this than taking a veteran role player like Thornton. Lower floor but higher ceiling.

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, GoZips88 said:

Wow ... forget 'offering' him ... go GET him and drag him back to Akron. 

Looks like a hell of an athlete. Would like to see more against Kentucky. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Zippy87 said:

 

I'd much rather take a shot on a player like this than taking a veteran role player like Thornton. Lower floor but higher ceiling.

 

There is no floor lower than what was set by our two NIU transfers thus far. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Blue & Gold said:

Huh?

More film* against Kentucky who it looked like they played.
 

Incredibly athletic. Would like to see if he showed some flashes against top level talent.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

There is no floor lower than what was set by our two NIU transfers thus far. 

I thought Hankerson was fine. Not a bust, not a star, but solid player in his role. I believe his stats went up here vs NIU.

 

Thornton definitely more disappointing.

  • Like 4
Posted
26 minutes ago, LZIp said:

I thought Hankerson was fine. Not a bust, not a star, but solid player in his role. I believe his stats went up here vs NIU.

 

Thornton definitely more disappointing.

 

Negative. Hankerson was a double digit scorer at NIU - 9.1 PPG at Akron. 

Posted
1 hour ago, LZIp said:

I thought Hankerson was fine. Not a bust, not a star, but solid player in his role. I believe his stats went up here vs NIU.

 

Thornton definitely more disappointing.

I thought Thornton was a bust.  He shot less than 50% from the line, could not create his own shot, could not drive to the basket, and did not have an outside shot.  

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Let'sGoZips94 said:

 

Negative. Hankerson was a double digit scorer at NIU - 9.1 PPG at Akron. 

That's because at NIU he was the #2 scoring option. At Akron he was relegated to being a distant #3 option as he had 2 All-MAC players ahead of him in the pecking order.

 

If you have the ball in your hands less and you take fewer shots, naturally you're going to score less. At Akron he was pretty much asked to be a 3 & D role player. That's the role he filled. I wasn't necessarily thrilled with his performance here, but we pretty much got what we recruited. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...